The correct answer is that there was $3,080 worth of office supplies purchased during the period.
In order to answer this question you know that the company started with $630 worth of office supplies and ended the year with $460 worth, or $170 less than they started with. The company used $170 of supplies from inventory, so they needed to purchase another $3,080 in order arrive at the $3,250 that we know was the total expense during the reporting period.
Answer:
$166,000
Explanation:
The net cash flow from operating activities using the indirect method is computed below:
Cash flow from Operating activities - Indirect method
Net income $175,000
Adjustment made:
Add : Depreciation expense $28,000
Less: Increase in accounts receivable -$16,000
Less: Decrease in accounts payable -$21,000
Total of Adjustments -$9,000
Net Cash flow from Operating activities $166,000
So lets say we have two investment opportunities. A new convenient store in your neighborhood or a new shopping center more than 5 miles away from where you live... What would you invest in well lets look at the pros and cons of each investment. So even though the new convenient store is right around the corner from you and prices are low the new shopping center has better products, warranty and higher prices unlike the convenient store closer to you. So we have an investment budget of $1000 dollars and want to spend it wisely we need to access what has a better chance of being successful with what you put into it. So the convenient store will reach less people has a bargain price but also doesn't have security cameras. Even though the shopping center has great employees, top-of-the-line products, high security, and a great establishment but also has flaws. What are you gonna invest in, will you take risks? My personal opinion is that I would invest in the shopping center because more people would be attracted to it because of the quality of service and products. So it would have a better probability in success and good use of my money.
Rose argued that the last part of a presentation to the VC should be " a wrap-up that leads to the final pitch."
David S. Rose is a prominent angel investor famous for being the founder and Chairman Emeritus of New York Angels.
In one of his entrepreneurship discourses, Rose claimed that the last part of a presentation to the VC should be the overall presentation in a short form that would comprise the main points of the all-around presentation.
Rose concluded that these key points should be the reason to convince a Venture Capitalist to invest in the business.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the last part of a presentation is crucial to convince a Venture Capitalist.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/23471689
Answer: (a) 6%
(b) 10.61%
(c) Yes
Explanation:
a) After tax cost of debt = Yield (1- tax)
= 8 ( 1 - 0.25)
= 8 × 0.75
= 6%
b) 
= 0.1061 or 10.61%
Note: Cost of preferred stock is not tax deductible
c),Yes the treasurer is correct ,The cost of debt is 5% less than cost of preferred stock [10.61 - 6 = 4.61%]
