1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leya [2.2K]
3 years ago
10

Why did native americans join potiacs rebellion?

Social Studies
2 answers:
Sloan [31]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

?

Explanation:

Nata [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: After the conclusion of the French and Indian War (1754-1763), Chief Pontiac (Ottawa) led a loosely united group of American Indian tribes against the British in a series of attacks, referred to as Pontiac’s Rebellion (1763-1766). They joined the rebellions because they were treated extremly unfairly being forced to move so that settlers could have more room. American Indians in the Ohio Country, Illinois Country, and Great Lakes region feared the loss of their French allies and the influx of colonists from east of the Appalachian Mountains settling on their land. To prevent the incursion of colonial settlers, Pontiac encouraged Ohio Country tribes to unite and to rise up against the British.

Explanation: Hope this helps! :)

You might be interested in
Risk tolerance involves both risk attitude and risk capacity. Risk attitude refers to the organization's _______________________
STALIN [3.7K]

Answer:

Risk attitude refers to the organization's <u>tendency to take or avoid risk.</u>

Explanation:

Risk attitude in an organization refers to the <u>tendency of stakeholders within the organization to either take on risky ventures </u><u>(risk seeking),</u><u> or try to avoid uncertain or risky situations</u> by only participating in risk free activities (risk aversion).

Some organizations are risk neutral and indifferent towards taking risks.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Discuss some of the early school-based attempts to prevent substance abuse and why they were abandoned.
slega [8]
Knowledge-attitude-behavior and model-providing information about drugs were provided. In some surveys conducted, they found out that students who were more knowledgeable about drugs were more likely to be using them. Affective education avoided particular discussion of drugs, worked on values, alternatives, and personal social skills. These attempts were discontinued due to the fact that they were not effective enough and they didn't present a clear enough anti-drug message.<span> </span>
7 0
3 years ago
What is the social impact of prader willi syndrome?
slava [35]
The impact of Prader-Willi syndrome on the family's quality of life and caregiving, and the unaffected siblings' psychosocial<span> adjustment. Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS), a </span>complex<span> multisystem genetic disorder, is characterised by developmental abnormalities leading to somatic and psychological symptoms.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Discuss three (3) typologies of followers.
storchak [24]

Answer:

Isolates

Isolates are completely detached. They don't care about their leaders, know anything about them or respond to them in any obvious way. Their alienation is, nevertheless, of consequence. By default – by knowing nothing and doing nothing – isolates strengthen leaders who already have the upper hand.

Bystanders

Bystanders observe but do not participate. They make a deliberate decision to stand aside, disengaging from their leaders and the group. This withdrawal is, in effect, a declaration of neutrality that amounts to tacit support for the status quo.

Participants

Participants are in some way engaged. They clearly favor or oppose their leaders and the groups and organizations of which they are a part. In either case, they care enough to invest some of what they have (time, for example) to have an impact.

Activists

Activists feel strongly about their leaders, and they act accordingly. They are eager, energetic and engaged. Because they are heavily invested in people and process, they work hard on behalf of their leaders or to undermine and even unseat them.

Diehards

Diehards are prepared to die for their cause, whether that is an individual, an idea or both. Diehards are deeply devoted to their leaders or, in contrast, ready to remove them from positions of power, authority and influence by any means necessary. Diehards are defined by their dedication, including their willingness to risk life and limb. Being a diehard is all-consuming. It is who you are. It determines what you do.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Did samuel de champlain have any siblings
shepuryov [24]
Yes,Samuel De Champlain had siblings, he had a brother named Jacob Champlain<span>

</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which side had the advantage in railroads? North or south?
    11·1 answer
  • Each question below presents a hypothesis for developing a historical argument. Select ALL of the questions that a historian's a
    9·1 answer
  • Do you think the Reid technique is an effective method of interrogation? Why or why not?
    10·2 answers
  • - What types of problems do
    5·1 answer
  • I shall wear white flannel trousers, and walk upon the beach. I have heard the mermaids singing, each to each. I do not think th
    7·2 answers
  • Debra Rodriguez is a 41-year-old woman. Debra applied for a job at Wymore Hospital as a medical assistant. During the hiring pro
    11·1 answer
  • The first step in scientific method, is to ask a question or....
    7·2 answers
  • Why did the Allies decide to attack North Africa instead of beginning with an attack on continental Europe?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements most accurately portrays the social views of Democrats and Republicans?
    7·2 answers
  • 3. In a short paragraph, describe one of the following foreign policy tools:
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!