The Hammurabi code was appropriate for checking the impunity of that era, where the poor and the weak lived at the mercy of the strong and wealthy.Some aspects however are no longer applicable with the modern conception of justice and fairness. For example,binding creditors to sell their wives and children to repay their debts is no longer practical but also cruel.
Answer:
- The way they choose their homes were different.
- Their main food sources are different.
Explanation:
- The way they choose their homes were different.
During the stone age, humans were nomadic. In order to fulfill their basic needs they have to engaged in hunting & gathering process to obtain foods and shelter from their environment. If the food in a certain area became too scarce, they will move and settle to another area.
During the agricultural age on the other hand, humans stayed in one place in a long period of time because they can produce their own food source. They're no longer need to hunt to fulfill their basic needs.
- Their main food sources are different.
During the stone age, animals meat and wild fruits were humans' main food source. As we entered the agricultural age, we started to developed food sources that were easy to produced and provide us with high calories. This is when we slowly transitioned into mostly consuming crops such as Potatoes, rice, and corn.
This is a question that refers to philosophical utilitarianism.
It is the search for the maximum happiness and pleasure, with the least possible suffering, but with an implicit moral question. When we are led to the feeling of pain or pleasure, we determine the way forward and know what is right or wrong.
In this way, it is possible that we are facing a moral dilemma. In our quest for happiness or minimizing our pain, our actions can impact others. That is, utilitarianism is essentially a teleological and consequentialist theory. Therefore, we must seek the impartial maximization of the happiness of all affected by our attitudes, regardless of the affective ties.
1 I’m pretty sure hope this helps
Answer:
Personally, a topic that always interests me is death.
Explanation:
I can research and get lost in thought about death for hours on end. I often find myself amused, frightened and sometimes angry at the topic of death. The act of dying is not what interests me, it is what happens after we die that i find interesting. It captivates me because the real answer is unknown,many claim to have seen death or that they have the answer to the question, "what happens once you die?" However the truth remains that death is an experience we all will only fully understand once we go through. I am sure some people who claim they've experienced the afterlife are being truthful in their sightings ,however with everyone's conflicting views and experience, it can only be theorised as we live on Earth. I turn to the internet, religious leaders and people i encounter for information.
