<span>It gave citizens the right to elect their members of the US Senate.
</span>
Good and bad pointsGood points of duty-based ethics<span><span>emphasises the value of every human being<span>Duty-based ethical systems tend to focus on giving equal respect to all human beings.This provides a basis for human rights - it forces due regard to be given to the interests of a single person even when those are at odds with the interests of a larger group.</span></span><span>says some acts are always wrong<span>Kantian duty-based ethics says that some things should never be done, no matter what good consequences they produce. This seems to reflect the way some human beings think.Rossian duty-based ethics modified this to allow various duties to be balanced, which, it could be argued, is an even better fit to the way we think.</span></span><span>provides 'certainty'<span>Consequentialist ethical theories bring a degree of uncertainty to ethical decision-making, in that no-one can be certain about what consequences will result from a particular action, because the future is unpredictable.Duty-based ethics don't suffer from this problem because they are concerned with the action itself - if an action is a right action, then a person should do it, if it's a wrong action they shouldn't do it - and providing there is a clear set of moral rules to follow then a person faced with a moral choice should be able to take decisions with reasonable certainty.Of course things aren't that clear cut. Sometimes consequentialist theories can provide a fair degree of certainty, if the consequences are easily predictable.Furthermore, rule-based consequentialism provides people with a set of rules that enable them to take moral decisions based on the sort of act they are contemplating.</span></span><span>deals with intentions and motives<span>Consequentialist theories don't pay direct attention to whether an act is carried out with good or bad intentions; most people think these are highly relevant to moral judgements.Duty-based ethics can include intention in at least 2 ways...If a person didn't intend to do a particular wrong act - it was an accident perhaps - then from a deontological point of view we might think that they hadn't done anything deserving of criticism. This seems to fit with ordinary thinking about ethical issues.Ethical rules can be framed narrowly so as to include intention.</span></span></span>Bad points of duty-based ethics<span><span>absolutistDuty-based ethics sets absolute rules. The only way of dealing with cases that don't seem to fit is to build a list of exceptions to the rule.</span><span>allows acts that make the world a less good place<span>Because duty-based ethics is not interested in the results it can lead to courses of action that produce a reduction in the overall happiness of the world.Most people would find this didn't fit with their overall idea of ethics:</span></span></span>
...it is hard to believe that it could ever
Answer:
obligatorio la ley.
Explanation:
following the law should always be more important
Answer:
Setting Accomodation
Explanation:
Test accommodation are often describes as modification of test taking, in which the situations make rooms for students with one form of disabilities to show their knowledge and skills in testing situations.
Such disabilities includes:
1. Physical disabilities
2. Leaning disabilities
3. Limitations in language disabilities
In this case, Marcus, who is suffering from Attention Deficit Disorder, which is part of learning disability, will need a "Setting accommodation" type of test taking to demonstrate his skills and knowledge. This is because, in this testing conditions, the location which is classroom, will be changed to a very quite but not disturbing place, and the length of time will be changed or increased in relation to conventional testing time.
Answer:
goal conflict
Explanation:
Goal conflict: The term "goal conflict" is described as the existence or presence of two or more than two competing goals which leads to developing a feeling of conflict in a person's mindset. Goal conflict generally occurs when two or more than two motives tend to block one another.
Goal conflict encompasses perceived or actual pressures from some incompatible expectations or goals.
In the question above, the given scenario signifies that Sarah and Denver have a "goal conflict".