The purpose of the IX Amendment was to claim the precept that the enumerated rights aren't exhaustive and very last and that the listing of certain rights does now no longer deny or disparage the life of different rights.
<h3>What do you know about Amendment IX?</h3>
No Title of Nobility will be granted with the aid of using the United States: And no Person preserving any Office of Profit or Trust below them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, take delivery of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any type whatever, from any King, Prince, or overseas State.
The rights included with the aid of using the Ninth Amendment aren't specified, they're mentioned as “unenumerated".
Therefore, The purpose of the IX Amendment was to claim the precept that the enumerated rights aren't exhaustive and very last and that the listing of certain rights does now no longer deny or disparage the life of different rights.
Learn more about IX Amendment here:
brainly.com/question/796033
#SPJ1
Answer:
This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future.
Explanation:
Answer:
You should think about fair competition.
Explanation:
The ethics question here would be: Is the contribution I'm willing to pay to get the contract a bribery? So, if there are better firms than mine but they don't have the money to pay the contribution, does it mean I get preferential treatment because I can afford it? Wouldn't it be considered unfair by many?
This a common practice in business and although seen morally wrong by many, it is the only way to ensure some contracts are signed. People who advocate this way of dealing with allocating contracts say that it is a fair way, everybody has the opportunity in life to make money and some people would always make more than others. Critics say that it's unfair, especially for smaller firms and developing companies, as their chances to win big contracts are being reduced drastically.
Answer:
Tax cuts boost demand by increasing disposable income and by encouraging businesses to hire and invest more.
Tax increases do the reverse. These demand effects can be substantial when the economy is weak but smaller when it is operating near capacity.
Explanation:
How do taxes affect the economy in the long run? High marginal tax rates can discourage work, saving, investment, and innovation, while specific tax preferences can affect the allocation of economic resources. But tax cuts can also slow long-run economic growth by increasing deficits
