Answer:
Option D: CE, ED, CD
Step-by-step explanation:
In a right triangle, the hypotenuse is always the longest side. Therefore, "CE, ED, CD" is the correct option.
1,2 and 5 is the answers I think
First we need to find the total annual costs for both the plans.
In case of leasing:
Fixed monthly cost = $420
So, yearly cost = 420 x 12 = $5040
Cost per mile = $0.08
For x miles driven, the cost per year for leasing will be = 5040 + 0.08x
In case of purchasing:
Fixed yearly cost = $4600
Cost per mile = 0.10
For x miles driven, the cost per year for leasing will be = 4600 + 0.10x
We want to find for what number of miles will the cost of leasing will be no more expensive than the cost of purchasing.
So,
Cost of leasing ≤ Cost of purchasing
5040 + 0.08x ≤ 4600 + 0.10x
440 ≤ 0.02x
22000 ≤ x
Thus, if if the number of miles driven are equal to or less than 22,000 leasing will be no more expensive than purchasing.
Answer: 26 dollars
Step-by-step explanation:
The owner needs to consider that:
To measure the risk she can multiply the probability of an event to happen (P)* the impact (I) (in this case the impact is the cost).
All these eventes can be considered as independent between each other (no correlation), so you can add their P*I.
In this case:
P1*I1= 1%*550=5.5
P2*I2=6%*150=9
P3*I3=15%*100=15
So, the expected value of what she may spend for repairng is = P1*I1+P2*I2+P3*I3= 5.5+9+15= 29.5
She shoould not spend more than 29.5 dollars, otherwise, she will spend more in the surge supresor than in expected reapring value
Answer:
x=9
Step-by-step explanation:
because I asked my in-collage brother who told me
<h2>*<u><em>THIS USER HAS BEEN VERIFIED AND ACCEPTED AS AN OFFICIAL BRAINLY© USER, ALLOWING THAT YOU GOT LUCKY FOR HAVING A PRO ANSWER THIS QUESTION*</em></u></h2>
