Based on occurrence analysis, superstitions are fallacies due to "<u>post hoc reasoning."</u>
This is because <u>post hoc reasoning</u> is a phenomenon or fallacy in which individuals believe that because one incident follows another, the initial incident must be the cause of the immediate incident.
While in some cases, this may be true, certain factors may also cause it, which is not part of the first incident.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option A. "<u>post hoc reasoning."</u>
Learn more about superstitions here: brainly.com/question/24743707
Answer:
Through her focus on death and decay
Explanation:
Answer:Mark may recall it as less serious accident than if the officer has used other wording (e.g., "smashed" each other)
Explanation: The use of the word "hit each other " makes it sound as if this might have not been a more serious accident than you might remember it but the use of the word smashed may create an idea that this was a more serious accident.
