1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SashulF [63]
3 years ago
14

Which is true about the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces? It is made up of military officers. It is a civilian tribunal. It

is a constitutional court. It is a court for veterans' claims.
Social Studies
2 answers:
Lunna [17]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is B) it is a civilian tribunal.

What is true about the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces is that it is made up of military officers is that it is a civilian tribunal.

Indeed, five civilian judges have a term of fifteen years in their position. These civilian judges are appointed by the US President, but the Senate has a word in the nomination. These civilian judges review appellations from the members of the armed forces such as the Navy, the Army, and the Air Force.

kupik [55]3 years ago
4 0

<u>The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces is a civilian tribunal. </u>

Further Explanation:

Civil tribunal is a court which operated as a part of the “judicial branch”, completely separate from the “military establishment”. These courts review serious ‘court-material convictions’ of “military personnel”.

Civil court is a institution of government that works on settling disputes or conflicts between two or more parties or entities, usually in the “same courthouse” that tries criminal cases too. Sometimes, the action like ‘assault’ will be tried in both “civil” and “criminal” court.

There are some important differences between criminal and civil court. Criminal courts are established to determine whether an individual has violated a ‘criminal law’. It is basically a law against endangering or harming others or their ‘property’. And if so, ‘punish’ the offender. While, civil courts are established to resolve differences or problems when private businesses or individuals can no longer attain an “agreement” on their own.

Learn More:

1. Though the outcomes of Schenck and New York Times differed, what did these decisions have in common? The government has a heavy burden to prove harm. The government can limit speech that causes harm. The government has unlimited power to limit speech. The government must follow the first amendment.

<u>brainly.com/question/1804110 </u>

2. how did California differ from the united states in terms of interactions of whites and natives

<u>brainly.com/question/7248802 </u>

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Civilian Tribunal

Subject: Social Studies

Keywords:

civil tribunal, judicial branch, military, government, assault, agreement, criminal law

You might be interested in
A hypothesis is a decision based on the results of the experiment. please select the best answer from the choices provided t f
Degger [83]
The answer to this is false. A hypothesis is an educated guess that someone makes BEFORE the experiment. 
3 0
2 years ago
Please help it will be brainlist
Iteru [2.4K]

Answer:

Death,bodily waste.lightening commercial fertilizer,legumes with nitrogen fixing bacteria.

hope it help

please mark as brainliest

4 0
2 years ago
Which principle of the constitution is guaranteed through the first ten amendments?.
Vikki [24]

The doctrine incorporation of the constitution is guaranteed through the first ten amendments.

Through the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, certain provisions of the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution, also known as the Bill of Rights, are made applicable to the states under the incorporation concept. Both administratively and substantively, incorporation is applicable.

The Supreme Court determined that the Bill of Rights only applied to the Federal government and to actions brought in federal courts before the doctrine (and the Fourteenth Amendment) were in place. The preamble to the Bill of Rights emphasizes the significance of the Bill of Rights in minimizing overreach by the newly constituted government.

Every state involved in the negotiations for the Constitution had varying degrees of worries with a too powerful Federal government. The Bill of Rights was obviously meant to place restrictions primarily on the federal authority, the Supreme Court ruled (see Barron v. City of Baltimore (1833)). States and state courts were free to enact such legislation at their discretion.

To learn more about The doctrine incorporation from given link

brainly.com/question/18601203

#SPJ4

8 0
9 months ago
How many species of carnivores alive today? please give me answers ​
krok68 [10]

Answer:

probably 13

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Popular sovereignty refers to the __________. A. way the national government treats the states B. popular laws in the Constituti
slamgirl [31]

Answer:

Popular sovereignty refers to the

d) People's right to rule

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • NO ANSWER NEEDED. ANSWER IS AT BOTTOM OF PASSAGE.
    13·2 answers
  • What is a racist govt
    5·1 answer
  • What are the four purposes of government
    5·1 answer
  • What criteria must be met to ensure that someone is an eligible voter?
    8·2 answers
  • Which Spanish explorer's route is shown on the map? A) John Cabot B) Henry Hudson C) Francisco Pizarro D) Hernando de Soto
    12·2 answers
  • A clothing store opens in a small college town, next to a large discount clothing store. The new store owner wants her customers
    13·1 answer
  • Why do counties enter into trade agreements
    9·1 answer
  • When people migrate by choice it is known as
    12·2 answers
  • According to the diagram, which country is closest to a total command economy?
    8·2 answers
  • if you take a nonenglish or oral test, you must also complete an additional test of your ability to recofnize the emaning f comm
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!