1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SashulF [63]
3 years ago
14

Which is true about the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces? It is made up of military officers. It is a civilian tribunal. It

is a constitutional court. It is a court for veterans' claims.
Social Studies
2 answers:
Lunna [17]3 years ago
4 0

The correct answer is B) it is a civilian tribunal.

What is true about the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces is that it is made up of military officers is that it is a civilian tribunal.

Indeed, five civilian judges have a term of fifteen years in their position. These civilian judges are appointed by the US President, but the Senate has a word in the nomination. These civilian judges review appellations from the members of the armed forces such as the Navy, the Army, and the Air Force.

kupik [55]3 years ago
4 0

<u>The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces is a civilian tribunal. </u>

Further Explanation:

Civil tribunal is a court which operated as a part of the “judicial branch”, completely separate from the “military establishment”. These courts review serious ‘court-material convictions’ of “military personnel”.

Civil court is a institution of government that works on settling disputes or conflicts between two or more parties or entities, usually in the “same courthouse” that tries criminal cases too. Sometimes, the action like ‘assault’ will be tried in both “civil” and “criminal” court.

There are some important differences between criminal and civil court. Criminal courts are established to determine whether an individual has violated a ‘criminal law’. It is basically a law against endangering or harming others or their ‘property’. And if so, ‘punish’ the offender. While, civil courts are established to resolve differences or problems when private businesses or individuals can no longer attain an “agreement” on their own.

Learn More:

1. Though the outcomes of Schenck and New York Times differed, what did these decisions have in common? The government has a heavy burden to prove harm. The government can limit speech that causes harm. The government has unlimited power to limit speech. The government must follow the first amendment.

<u>brainly.com/question/1804110 </u>

2. how did California differ from the united states in terms of interactions of whites and natives

<u>brainly.com/question/7248802 </u>

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Civilian Tribunal

Subject: Social Studies

Keywords:

civil tribunal, judicial branch, military, government, assault, agreement, criminal law

You might be interested in
What happened on the third day of the convention?
zalisa [80]

Answer:

The Constitutional Convention took place from May 14 to September 17, 1787, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The point of the event was decide how America was going to be governed. Although the Convention had been officially called to revise the existing Articles of Confederation, many delegates had much bigger plans.

7 0
3 years ago
Gracie, a researcher, is interested in analyzing the relationship between smoking and life span. The results of her correlationa
Brilliant_brown [7]

This is an example of the <u>"negative" </u>kind of correlation.


A negative correlation implies that there is a reverse connection between two variables - when one variable reduces, the other increases. The other way around is a negative correlation as well, in which one variable increments and alternate declines. These connections are considered in measurements as a methods for deciding the connection between two factors.

3 0
3 years ago
OPEN ENDED QUESTION
Lorico [155]
I think it is an awareness for all of the changes have made in this earth and what we could not of done without them. And yes it’s important for students to know
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the Articles of Confederation fail? 1 Paragraph in which you discuss two specific problems 1​
sergejj [24]

Answer:

1. The states didn’t act immediately. It took until February 1779 for 12 states to approve the document. Maryland held out until March 1781, after it settled a land argument with Virginia.

2. The central government was designed to be very, very weak. The Articles established “the United States of America” as a perpetual union formed to defend the states as a group, but it provided few central powers beyond that. But it didn’t have an executive official or judicial branch.

3. The Articles Congress only had one chamber and each state had one vote. This reinforced the power of the states to operate independently from the central government, even when that wasn’t in the nation’s best interests.

4. Congress needed 9 of 13 states to pass any laws. Requiring this high supermajority made it very difficult to pass any legislation that would affect all 13 states.

5. The document was practically impossible to amend. The Articles required unanimous consent to any amendment, so all 13 states would need to agree on a change. Given the rivalries between the states, that rule made the Articles impossible to adapt after the war ended with Britain in 1783.

6. The central government couldn’t collect taxes to fund its operations. The Confederation relied on the voluntary efforts of the states to send tax money to the central government. Lacking funds, the central government couldn’t maintain an effective military or back its own paper currency.

7. States were able to conduct their own foreign policies. Technically, that role fell to the central government, but the Confederation government didn’t have the physical ability to enforce that power, since it lacked domestic and international powers and standing.

8. States had their own money systems. There wasn’t a common currency in the Confederation era. The central government and the states each had separate money, which made trade between the states, and other countries, extremely difficult.

9. The Confederation government couldn’t help settle Revolutionary War-era debts. The central government and the states owed huge debts to European countries and investors. Without the power to tax, and with no power to make trade between the states and other countries viable, the United States was in an economic mess by 1787.

10. Shays’ rebellion – the final straw. A tax protest by western Massachusetts farmers in 1786 and 1787 showed the central government couldn’t put down an internal rebellion. It had to rely on a state militia sponsored by private Boston business people. With no money, the central government couldn't act to protect the "perpetual union."

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which type of text relies on the effectiveness of logical fallacies? (6 points)
lana66690 [7]

Arguments that appear to be legitimate but are really founded on poor reasoning are known as logical fallacies. They could be the product of unintentional thinking mistakes or purposely employed to deceive others.

Taking logical fallacies at its value might cause to base our conclusions on weak arguments and result in poor decisions. Some of the text relies on the effectiveness of logical fallacies are :

  • The Bandwagon Fallacy:  Bandwagon fallacies, such as "three out of four individuals think X brand toothpaste cleans teeth best," are something that most of us expect to see in advertising; nonetheless, this fallacy may easily find its way into regular meetings and conversations.
  • The Appeal to Authority Fallacy: Having an authoritative person support your claim might be a strong supplement to an existing argument, but it cannot be the main tenet of your case. Something is not always real just because a powerful person thinks it to be true.
  • The False Dilemma Fallacy: The false dilemma fallacy claims that there are only two possible endings, which are mutually incompatible, rather than understanding that most (if not all) topics may be conceived of on a spectrum of options and perspectives.
  • The Hasty Generalization Fallacy: This mistake happens when someone makes broad assumptions based on  insufficient data. In other words, they ignore plausible counterarguments and make assumptions about the truth of a claim that has some, but insufficient, supporting evidence.
  • The Slothful Induction Fallacy: This fallacy happens when there is enough logical evidence to conclude something is true, but someone refuses to admit it, instead attributing the result to coincidence or something completely unrelated.
  • The Correlation Fallacy: If two things seem to be linked, it doesn't always follow that one of them caused the other indisputablelly. Even while it can seem like a straightforward fallacy to recognise, it can be difficult to do so in actual practise, especially if you truly want to uncover a link between two pieces of information to support your claim.

To learn more  logical fallacies refer

brainly.com/question/18094137

#SPJ4

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Name three things that banneker is known for
    12·1 answer
  • Explain the importance of filial piety to the chinese. how does the concept of filial piety relate to the confucian view of how
    7·1 answer
  • Two clerks sharing the same cash register is a violation of which internal control principle?
    7·1 answer
  • TASK
    9·1 answer
  • What is human-environmental interaction​
    10·1 answer
  • What type of star is this can you please answer
    15·1 answer
  • What is likely to happen to Colombia if it cannot prevent its farmers from growing coca?
    7·1 answer
  • Soil degradation, rising population, water scarcity, and a lack of capital put which of the following regions at the
    10·1 answer
  • Short definition of imperialism in your own words plz
    6·1 answer
  • TIME REMAIN
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!