Answer:
Government policymakers decided to reduce the rate of inflation from 3% to 1.6%. As a result, the unemployment rate increased from 4.8% to 6.2%. The sacrifice ratio is:______
d. none of the above
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Old inflation rate = 3%
New inflation rate = 1.6%
Old unemployment rate = 4.8%
New unemployment rate = 6.2%
Ratio of old inflation rate to old unemployment rate = 3 : 4.8 = 0.625
Ratio of new inflation rate to new unemployment rate = 1.6% : 6.2% = 0.258
Sacrifice ratio = Difference between the two ratios = 0.367 (0.625 - 0.258)
b) The sacrifice ratio is the difference between the old ratio and the new ratio of inflation rate to unemployment rate.
Answer:
E. All the statements are correct
Explanation:
i. Corporations rarely pay tax on the interest income.
This statement is correct. Some companies do not even pay any income taxes.
ii. Higher tax bracket people tend to buy municipal bond because it is federal tax exempt.
Correct, people who have high incomes, and are subject to a high federal income tax rate often buy municipal bonds because these bonds are exempt from federal income tax.
iii. Short term capital gain and long-term capital gain are treated differently for individuals.
Correct. Short-term capital gains are those obtained from the sale of property that was owned for less than one year. This gains are often treated with the highest tax rate.
Long-term capital gains are those obtained from the sale of property that was owned for more than one year, and are treated with more favorable tax rates.
iv. The corporate tax rates in the U.S. is one of the lowest among the developed nations.
This statement is correct. The corporate tax rate in the U.S. is a nominal 21% (the effective rate can be as low as 0% for some companies). This is one of the lowest rates among developed nations, whose rates hover around 25 to 30% on average.
Answer:
$33.50
Explanation:
we can use the perpetual growth model to determine the price of the stock
the firm's stock price = ($1.25 x 1.15)/1.11 + ($1.25 x 1.15²)/1.11² + ($1.25 x 1.15³)/1.11³ + [($1.25 x 1.15³ x 1.06)/(11% - 6%)]/1.11³
the stock price in 3 years = ($1.25 x 1.15³ x 1.06)/(11% - 6%) = $40.30
the firm's stock price = ($1.25 x 1.15)/1.11 + ($1.25 x 1.15²)/1.11² + ($1.25 x 1.15³)/1.11³ + $40.30/1.11³ = $1.30 + $1.34 + $1.39 + $29.47 = $33.50
Considering the situation above, by building a strong brand, Wilson has effectively "<u>reduced the price elasticity of demand for its products</u>."
This is because the price elasticity of demand is a term in economics that defines the sensitivity of the quantity demanded of a commodity to its price.
Usually, the price elasticity of demand shows that when the price of a commodity increase, the quantity demanded decreases.
Thus, in this case, since it is said that Kendra allowed Wilson to charge a higher price and not lose many sales, therefore, Wilson has been able to reduce the price elasticity of demand for its products.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/15654343