Answer:
The correct response will be "Paying a premium price
".
Explanation:
- Each consumption has the fundamental economic intention of obtaining products that have the highest possible and the limit requirements at the lowest competitive prices.
- And therefore, satisfied customers frequently ignore that instinct because some other manufacturer is still connected to something like the commodity.
Answer:
The annualized return is 14.82%
Explanation:
The formula for annualized return is given as Annualized return = (1+ holding return)12/n - 1
Holding return is 8.4%
n is the holding period of 7 months
Annualized return =(1+0.084)^(12/7)-1
Annualized return =14.82%
It is wrong to simply calculate annualized return as 8,4%*12/7,which means one is taking the interest to annual interest by proportional method,as this gives 14.40%, in investment every basis point counts.
The difference between the two figures is 0.42% which could translate into millions depending on the amount invested as well as the duration of investment
Answer:
The Asset is a Qualifying Asset.
Explanation:
Qualifying Assets take substantial period of <em>time</em> to get ready for its intended use and purpose and that will require capitalizing interest costs or borrowing cost to the asset.
Answer:
The monthly deposit is calculated using PMT function :
rate = 1.2%/2 (converting annual rate into monthly rate)
nper = 12 * 5 (5 years of deposits with 12 monthly deposits each year)
pv = -3200 (Amount put into account now. This is entered with a negative sign because it is a cash outflow)
fv = 26865 (Required value of account after 5 years)
PMT is calculated to be $379.70.
The monthly deposit is $379.70.
Answer:
(b.) Isabel will have a judgment entered in her favor
Explanation:
Under the Rules of the court Josh's action is referred to as Default of Appearance. Isabel is the Complainant while Josh is the Defendant.
It is the law that where a Defendant fails to appear before the court where there is a proof of service of the summons on him or her, Complainant may apply to the Judge for a judgement in respect of the claim on the summons to be entered in his or her favor against the Defendant.
Therefore, in the instance case at hand, Isabel will have a judgment entered in her favor for failure of Josh to appear before the court.
Option (a) is not the answer because Isabel does not need to file an amended complaint because Isabel did not ask the court for any amendment of her complaint. Isabel can only file an amended complaint if she intends to change her complaint against Josh.
Option (c) is not also the answer because Josh chooses to ignore the summons served on him. If for instance Josh did not get the summons served on him or the judge is of the opinion that Josh was not properly served, then the court can order that Josh must be served with a second summons.
Option (d) is also not the answer because Josh cannot have a judgment entered in his favor because he is the person who defaulted appearance before the court. A party who is in default of appearance cannot have judgment entered in his favor.
