Answer:
The variance is 4,000 - 4,200 = -200 (favourable variance).
Explanation:
To know the production variance in this exercise, we first need to know the total standard cost, then calculate the difference between the actual cost and the standard one.
Total standard cost = production volume x hour used per one unit produced x overhead cost per hour = 1,000 x 3 x 1.4 = 4,200
So, the variance is 4,000 - 4,200 = -200 (favourable variance).
The marketplace is full of both potential and non-potential customers which makes this statement <u>True</u>.
<h3>Are both potential and non-potential customers in the market?</h3>
The market does indeed have both potential customers for a product and non-potential customers who would not want to buy the product.
As a result, it is not possible to directly market to only potential customers, but to the entire marketplace.
Find out more on potential customers at brainly.com/question/3053467.
#SPJ1
It would actually be an increased production by the business.
Haha, I had to think for a tiny bit and re-check my answer to make sure it was right before giving it. Would hate to see you get it wrong.
Answer:
Macmillana's GDP is less sensitive economic fluctuations than Bloedelo's GDP. Two reasons account for this:
1) The keynesian multiplier is smaller.
The keynesian multiplier tells us about the sensitivity of GDP to increases in domestic expenditure (consumption, investment or government purchases). If the keynesian multiplier is small, then, GDP will be less sensitive to fluctuations in aggregate expenditure.
2) Macmillana's economy has implemented automatic stabilizers, while Bloedelo's economy has not.
Automatic Stabilizers are government policies meant to reduce fluctuations in GDP. The two most common automatic stabilizers are: income taxes and unemployment benefits.
Automatic Stabilizers reduce the kenyensian multiplier, dampening Macmillana's GDP sensitivity to fluctuations even more.
