1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NISA [10]
3 years ago
14

Laura sells beaded necklaces each large necklace sells for $6.80 and each small necklace sells for $5.10 how much will she earn

from selling three large necklace and one small necklace
Mathematics
1 answer:
Alex Ar [27]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

25.5

Step-by-step explanation:

3 large necklaces equals 20.4 plus 5.10 equals 25.5

You might be interested in
Ava and Kelly ran a road race, starting from the same place at the same time. Ava ran at an average speed of 6 miles per hour. K
zalisa [80]
<h2>Hello!</h2>

The answer is:

It will took 0.375 hours for Ava and Kelly to be 3/4 miles apart.

<h2>Why?</h2>

To calculate how long after they start they will be 3/4 miles apart, we need to write two equations.

So, writing the equations, we have:

Calculations for Ava:

We have the following information,

v_{Ava}=6mph

Then, writing the equation,

x_{Ava}=x_{o}+v_{Ava}*t

x_{Ava}=x_{o}+v_{6mph}*t

Calculations for Kelly:

We have the following information,

v_{Kelly}=8mph

We need to calculate when Kelly will be 3/4 miles apart of Ava, so, it's position will be the Ava's position plus 3/4 miles.

Then, writing the equation,

x_{Ava}+0.75miles=x_{o}+v_{Kelly}*t

x_{Ava}+0.75miles=x_{o}+v_{8mph}*t

Now, substituting Ava's speed into the second equation, we have:

x_{o}+6mph*t+0.75miles=x_{o}+8mph*t

6mph*t+0.75miles=+8mph*t

8mph*t-6mph*t=0.75miles

2mph*t=0.75miles

t=\frac{0.75miles}{2mph}=0.375hours

Hence, we have that it will took 0.375 hours for Ava and Kelly to be 3/4 miles apart.

Have a nice day!

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Jill’s bowling scores are approximately normally distributed with mean 170 and standard deviation 20, while Jack’s scores are ap
miss Akunina [59]

Answer:

a) The probability of Jack scoring higher is 0.3446

b) They probability of them scoring above 350 is 0.2119

Step-by-step explanation:

Lets call X the random variable that determines Jill's bowling score and Y the random variable that determines jack's. We have

X \simeq N(170,400)\\Y \simeq N(160,225)

Note that we are considering the variance on the second entry, the square of the standard deviation.

If we have two independent Normal distributed random variables, then their sum is also normally distributed. If fact, we have this formulas:

N(\lambda_1, \sigma^2_1) + N(\lambda_2, \sigma^2_2) = N(\lambda_1 + \lambda_2,\sigma^2_1 + \sigma^2_2) \\r* N(\lambda_1, \sigma^2_1) = N(r\lambda_1,r^2\sigma^2_1)  

for independent distributions N(\lambda_1, \sigma^2_1) , N(\lambda_2, \sigma^2_2) , and a real number r.

a) We define Z to be Y-X. We want to know the probability of Z being greater than 0. We have

Z = Y-X = N(160,225) - N(170,400) = N(160,225) + (N(-170,(-1)^2 * 400) = N(-10,625)

So Z is a normal random variable with mean equal to -10 and vriance equal to 625. The standard deviation of Z is √625 = 25.

Lets work with the standarization of Z, which we will call W. W = (Z-\mu)/\sigma = (Z+10)/25. W has Normal distribution with mean 0 and standard deviation 1. We have

P(Z > 0) = P( (Z+10)/25 > (0+10)/25) = P(W > 0.4)

To calculate that, we will use the <em>known </em>values of the cummulative distribution function Φ of the standard normal distribution. For a real number k, P(W < k) = Φ(k). You can find those values in the Pdf I appended below.

Since Φ is a cummulative distribution function, we have P(W > 0.4) = 1- Φ(0.4)

That value of Φ(0.4) can be obtained by looking at the table, it is 0.6554. Therefore P(W > 0.4) = 1-0.6554 = 0.3446

As a result, The probability of Jack's score being higher is 0.3446. As you may expect, since Jack is expected to score less that Jill, the probability of him scoring higher is lesser than 0.5.

b) Now we define Z to be X+Y Since X and Y are independent Normal variables with mean 160 and 170 respectively, then Z has mean 330. And the variance of Z is equal to the sum of the variances of X and Y, that is, 625. Hence Z is Normally distributed with mean 330 and standard deviation rqual to 25 (the square root of 625).

We want to know the probability of Z being greater that 350, for that we standarized Z. We call W the standarization. W is s standard normal distributed random variable, and it is obtained from Z by removing its mean 330 and dividing by its standard deviation 25.

P(Z > 350) = P((Z  - 330)/25 > (350-330)/25) = P(W > 0.8) = 1-Φ(0.8)

The last equality comes from the fact that Φ is a cummulative distribution function. The value of Φ(0.8) by looking at the table is 0.7881, therefore P(X+Y > 350) = 1 - Φ(0.8) = 0.2119.

As you may expect, this probability is pretty low because the mean value of the sum of their combined scores is quite below 350.

I hope this works for you!

Download pdf
6 0
3 years ago
Candice won the lottery for 30000 dollars.However 20% of her money has to go to the state for taxes.How much money will she rece
Trava [24]

Answer:

She will receive $24,000 after paying taxes

Step-by-step explanation:

This question can be solved using a rule of three.

20% of her money has to go to the state for taxes. So she will receive 100-20 = 80%. $30000 is 100% = 1. How much is 80% = 0.8?

$30000 - 1

$x - 0.8

x = 30000*0.8

x = 24000

She will receive $24,000 after paying taxes

7 0
3 years ago
How to find slope when there is the y intercept and x-intercept?
natta225 [31]
First graph your x and y intercept then pick any two points on the line.
\frac{rise}{run} = \frac{y2 - y1}{x2 - x1}
that's the equation used to find your slope

Example:

(4,2) (8,6) let's say those are the points you pick from the line

so then you subtract 6-2=4 (6 is your y2 and 2 is your y1)

then subtracts 8-4=4 (8is your x2 and 4 is your x1)

then your left with
\frac{2}{4}
if you can reduce the reduce in this case you can which leaves you with
\frac{1}{2}
and that's how you find the slope
4 0
3 years ago
50 points :] !!
nasty-shy [4]

Given,

LP = 15, PR = 9

Point P lies on the line segment PR. It would mean that,

LP + PR = LR

⇒LR = 15 + 9

⇒ LR = 24

Hence, "LR = 24 because LP + PR = LR according to the Segment Addition Postulate, and 15 + 9 = 24 using substitution" is the correct option.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is 0.000000783 written in scientific notation?<br><br><br><br> Enter your answer in the box.
    5·2 answers
  • What is the solution to the system of equations?<br><br> y = 2x – 3.5<br><br> x – 2y = –14
    12·1 answer
  • What is converse inverse and contrapostive?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following correctly uses absolute value to show the distance between −50 and 12? |−50 − 12| = |−62| = −62 units
    13·2 answers
  • When adding two numbers, the number of significant figures in the sum is equal to the number of significant figures in the least
    12·1 answer
  • What is the answer to negative three eights plus five sixths?
    13·2 answers
  • Round 19.798 to the nearest tens place.
    8·2 answers
  • Please helpppppppjshdbdjshjdbdjdjsbdnd
    14·1 answer
  • How do you use the distributive property to simplify an algebraic<br> expression?
    15·1 answer
  • Which transformations would result in the image shown?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!