1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Art [367]
3 years ago
10

1. Matthew plans to go back to college to finish his degree. A local bank will lend him $8,000 for

Mathematics
2 answers:
Fiesta28 [93]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

5774883839

Step-by-step explanation:

Matthew plans to go back to college to finish his degree. A local bank will lend him $8,000 for 6 years

at the interest rate of 8% per year to pay for his first semester. How much interest will the bank charge?

wlad13 [49]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

3,840.00

Step-by-step explanation:

i did this b4

You might be interested in
An item costs n dollars. If the price of the item increases by 25%, the new price can be represented by the expression n + 0.25n
Schach [20]

D.

Explanation

I saw this answer in a different question today.

Moreover, 1n + 0.25n = 1.25n

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A ball is thrown up in the air, and it's height (in feet) as a function of time (in seconds) can be written as h(t) = -16t2 + 32
olga2289 [7]

Answer:

1) Using properties of the quadratic equation:

Here the height equation is:

h(t) = -16t^2 + 32t + 6

We can see that the leading coefficient is negative, this means that the arms of the graph will open downwards.

Then, the vertex of the quadratic equation will be the maximum.

Remember that for a general quadratic equation:

a*x^2 + b*x + c = y

the x-value of the vertex is:

x = -b/2a

Then in our case, the vertex is at:

t = -32/(2*-16) = 1

The maximum height will be the height equation evaluated in this time:

h(1) = -16*1^2 + 32*1 + 6 = 22

The maximum height is 22ft

2) Second method, using physics.

We know that an object reaches its maximum height when the velocity is equal to zero (the velocity equal to zero means that, at this point, the object stops going upwards).

If the height equation is:

h(t) = -16*t^2 + 32*t + 6

the velocity equation is the first derivation of h(t)

Remember that for a function f(x) = a*x^n

we have that:

df(x)/dx = n*a*x^(n-1)

Then:

v(t) = dh(t)/dt = 2*(-16)*t + 32 + 0

v(t) = -32*t + 32

Now we need to find the value of t such that the velocity is equal to zero:

v(t) = 0 = -32*t + 32

       32*t = 32

            t = 32/32 = 1

So the maximum height is at t = 1

(same as before)

Now we just need to evaluate the height equation in t = 1:

h(1) = -16*1^2 + 32*1 + 6 = 22

The maximum height is 22ft

4 0
3 years ago
3-12t+8t simplify each Expression
kakasveta [241]
Combine the like terms:

3 - 12t + 8t = 3 - 4t

simplified answer is

-4t + 3
3 0
3 years ago
For <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=e%5E%7B-x%5E2%2F2%7D" id="TexFormula1" title="e^{-x^2/2}" alt="e^{-x^2/2}" align="absmiddl
nevsk [136]
I'm assuming you're talking about the indefinite integral

\displaystyle\int e^{-x^2/2}\,\mathrm dx

and that your question is whether the substitution u=\dfrac x{\sqrt2} would work. Well, let's check it out:

u=\dfrac x{\sqrt2}\implies\mathrm du=\dfrac{\mathrm dx}{\sqrt2}
\implies\displaystyle\int e^{-x^2/2}\,\mathrm dx=\sqrt2\int e^{-(\sqrt2\,u)^2/2}\,\mathrm du
=\displaystyle\sqrt2\int e^{-u^2}\,\mathrm du

which essentially brings us to back to where we started. (The substitution only served to remove the scale factor in the exponent.)

What if we tried u=\sqrt t next? Then \mathrm du=\dfrac{\mathrm dt}{2\sqrt t}, giving

=\displaystyle\frac1{\sqrt2}\int \frac{e^{-(\sqrt t)^2}}{\sqrt t}\,\mathrm dt=\frac1{\sqrt2}\int\frac{e^{-t}}{\sqrt t}\,\mathrm dt

Next you may be tempted to try to integrate this by parts, but that will get you nowhere.

So how to deal with this integral? The answer lies in what's called the "error function" defined as

\mathrm{erf}(x)=\displaystyle\frac2{\sqrt\pi}\int_0^xe^{-t^2}\,\mathrm dt

By the fundamental theorem of calculus, taking the derivative of both sides yields

\dfrac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm dx}\mathrm{erf}(x)=\dfrac2{\sqrt\pi}e^{-x^2}

and so the antiderivative would be

\displaystyle\int e^{-x^2/2}\,\mathrm dx=\sqrt{\frac\pi2}\mathrm{erf}\left(\frac x{\sqrt2}\right)

The takeaway here is that a new function (i.e. not some combination of simpler functions like regular exponential, logarithmic, periodic, or polynomial functions) is needed to capture the antiderivative.
3 0
3 years ago
Need help<br> Solve 3x−5 = 9.
kipiarov [429]
Well, it would end up to 3x=14 which is x=4.33
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • it costs $4 dollars to enter the fair. each ride costs $2.50. you have $21.50. how many rides can you go on?
    12·1 answer
  • the us consumes an average of 5.5 million metrics of bananas per year. there are 316 million people in the us and there are 1000
    5·1 answer
  • Find the difference -24 -8
    12·1 answer
  • What is the solution to -6 + 5(1-x) = - 13 – 7 x?
    12·2 answers
  • What is <br> A= 3000(1+.036/12)^72<br> Algebra 2 compound interest
    10·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!!!!
    14·2 answers
  • Help please!!! show work aswell
    10·1 answer
  • Can someone please help me with this ASAP ill love you forever
    10·1 answer
  • 2.2.3 Quiz: Angle Theorems
    13·1 answer
  • 3-(4-2) 5<br> 3.4-2.5<br> 11-4-2<br> 2015<br> 11 (42)<br> (7-3)-(4-2)7-3-4-2
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!