1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
wariber [46]
3 years ago
9

Wнaт are тнe anѕwerѕ тo тнιѕ

Mathematics
1 answer:
insens350 [35]3 years ago
5 0
All you have to do is basically divide and make a diagram
You might be interested in
13/100 + 11/10 helpppp
zhannawk [14.2K]

Answer:

13/100 + 11/10 = 123/100

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which ordered pairs is a solution to -5x + 3y > 12?
GaryK [48]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  (-5, 5), (2, 8), (-6, 0)

Step-by-step explanation:

It is convenient to graph the solution, then plot the points to see which fall in the solution area.

The point (3, 9) falls on the boundary line, which is <em>not</em> part of the solution set.

The points that are solutions are ...

  B(-5, 5)

  E(2, 8)

  F(-6, 0)

5 0
3 years ago
Pls help me, cause I don't understand one bit of it at all​
topjm [15]

Answer:

I promise you this is easier than it looks, just bare with me.

You have to order these numbers from the smallest to the biggest. Now before we do this, we wanna make the fractions and mixed numbers decimals to make this easier.

5 8/11

Convert the fraction to a decimal: Divide the numerator by the denominator.  (8 divide by 11).

Add this decimal number to the whole number part of the mixed number. (0.72 plus 5)

It would be 5.72

Now 57/10

The same steps as the last one, but since it isn't a mixed number you don't add anything. (57 divided by 10)

It would be 5.7

Now we have to order them from least to greatest. How do we figure that out? Well lets list the numbers that we have now:

5.72

5.7

5.67

5.726

Now since they all have the same whole number, we just have to look at the numbers after the decimal.  Well the least number we have here is "7". Then it would be 67, then 72, then 726.

So the answer would be from least to greatest:

5.7

5.67

5.72

5.726

I hope this helps..sorry if I took so long I wanted to make sure I explained this as good as I can so you don't keep struggling. Good luck, take care <3

Have a good night/day (:! Much love!

8 0
3 years ago
Same way of solving<br>​
Paul [167]

Answer

96 inches cubed

Step-by-step explanation:

Ok, same way of solving then. Just with a few more useless numbers. Take rectangular prism A, 6in x 3in x 3in, you will get 54in^3.

Then take prism B, 2in x 3in x 7in, you will get 42in^3.

Finally, take those two numbers, add them, and you end up with 96in^3

6 0
3 years ago
Moose Drool Makes Grass More Appetizing Different species can interact in interesting ways. One type of grass produces the toxin
antiseptic1488 [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

1)

The variable of interest is

X: level of toxin ergovaline on the grass after being treated with Moose saliva.

>The parameter of interest is the population mean of the level of ergovaline on grass after being treated with Moose saliva: μ

The best point estimate for the population mean is the sample mean:

>X[bar]=0.183 Sample average level of ergovaline on the grass after being treated with Moose saliva.

Assuming that the sample comes from a normal population.

>There is no information about the sample size takes to study the effects of the Moose saliva in the grass. Let's say that they worked with a sample of n=20

Using the Student-t you can calculate the CI as:

X[bar] ± t_{n-1;1-\alpha /2} * \frac{S}{\sqrt{n} }

Where   t_{n-1;1-\alpha /2}= t_{19;0.975}= 2.093

0.183 ± 2.093 * (0.016/√20)

[0.175;0.190]

Using a 95% confidence level you'd expect that the interval [0.175;0.190] will contain the true average of ergovaline level of grass after being treated with Moose saliva.

2)

The information of a study that shows how much does the consumption of canned soup increase urinary BPA concentration is:

Consumption of canned soup for over 5 days increases the urinary BPA more than 1000%

75 individuals consumed soup for five days (either canned or fresh)

The study reports that a 95% confidence interval for the difference in means (canned minus fresh) is 19.6 to 25.5 μg/L.

>This experiment is a randomized comparative experiment.

Out of the 75 participants, some randomly eat canned soup and some randomly eaten fresh soup conforming to two separate and independent groups that were later compared.

>The parameter of interest is the difference between the population mean of urinary BPA concentration of people who ate canned soup for more than 5 days and the population mean of urinary BPA concentration of people that ate fresh soup for more than 5 days.

>Using a 95% confidence level you'd expect that the interval 19.6 to 25.5 μg/L would contain the value of the difference between the population mean of urinary BPA concentration of people who ate canned soup for more than 5 days and the population mean of urinary BPA concentration of people that ate fresh soup for more than 5 days.

> If the sample had been larger, then you'd expect a narrower CI, the relationship between the amplitude of the CI and sample size is indirect. Meaning that the larger the sample, the more accurate the estimation per CI is.

3)

> The parameter of interest is Average Long-Term Weight Gain Overeating for just four weeks can increase fat mass and weight over two years later of people with an average age of 26 years old.

> The only way of finding the true value of the parameter is if you were to use the information of the whole population of interest, this is making all swedes with an average age of 26 increase calorie intake by 70% (mostly by eating fast food) and limit their daily activity to a maximum of 5000 steps per day and then measure their weight gain over two years. since this es virtually impossible to do, due to expenses and size of the population, is that the estimation with a small but representative sample is conducted.

>

n= 18

X[bar]= 6.8 lbs

S= 1.2

X[bar] ± t_{n-1;1-\alpha /2} * (S/√n)

6.8 ± 2.101 * (1.2/√18)

t_{n-1;1-\alpha /2}= t_{17;0.975}= 2.101

[6.206;7.394]

With a 95% confidence level, you'd expect that the interval [6.206;7.394] will contain the true value of the Average Long-Term Weight Gain Overeating for just four weeks can increase fat mass and weight over two years later of people with an average age of 26 years old.

>

The margin of error of the interval is

t_{n-1;1-\alpha /2} * (S/√n)= 2.101 * (1.2/√18)= 0.59

With a 95% it is expected that the true value of the Average Long-Term Weight Gain Overeating for just four weeks can increase fat mass and weight over two years later of people with an average age of 26 years old. will be 0.59lbs away from the sample mean.

I hope it helps

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Equation of direct variation involving a common proportion. Then identify the constant of variation
    9·1 answer
  • Amelia borrows $13450 for a round-the-world trip. Her repayments are $128 per week for 3 years. How much interest is she charged
    15·1 answer
  • What is the solution 2.8y + 6 + 0.2y = 5y – 14
    10·1 answer
  • What is the interquartile range of this data set?<br> 2, 5, 9, 11, 18, 30, 42, 48, 55, 73, 81
    5·1 answer
  • Use the following figure to answer the question. 1 and 5 are _____ angles. vertical alternate interior corresponding right
    5·2 answers
  • How do you graph inequalities on a number line?
    7·1 answer
  • Determine the future value of a $25000 investment at an annual rate of 4.85% compounded quarterly for 6 years.
    6·1 answer
  • 1/6+1/2 simplest form
    14·1 answer
  • If 3x x 10=22, what is the value of 5x +8?
    15·1 answer
  • Hey can someone please help me asap
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!