Answer:
misattribution of arousal
Explanation:
Terri is relying on the psychological concept known as misattribution of arousal.
Misattribution of arousal in psychology is the concept used to describe the situation whereby individuals can be aroused by sources other than what was supposed to cause the arousal, it is when individuals wrongly attribute the stimulus that is responsible for their physiological arousal.
Terri's client may not have been aroused by the first date but by the expectation that a first date should result in physiological arousal.
Answer:
Judicial review
Explanation:
A judicial review is a proceeding in court, whereby the judge examines the lawfulness of a decision about a particular case. This review is to determine the way the judgement was passed not the rightfulness or wrongfulness of the conclusion, it is always a challenge.
In this case, the court reviews the facts of the case,to justify, to determine whether removal of the child from home is properly done and notifies the parent of the charges against them
Answer: c. neither the subjects in the experimental or control groups nor the experimenters know which are the experimental and control groups
Explanation:
A double minded study could be described as one where both the party carrying out the experiment and the perty involved in the experiment do not know themselves. The researcher has no idea with whom they are interacting with. They just perform function and go their way. The purpose of the study is to eliminate suggestion among pratitioners.
Answer:
Superior
Explanation:
Hope this answer helps :)
