The answer to this question is <span>franchise
</span><span>franchise refers to a form of business model that give other party the right to use the company's business model.
</span>As a return, that other party have to pay a certain percentage of money periodically based on the sales that they made by using the franchise.
A; sounds like the best option
Answer:
From the information given about the contract and its execution between the two parties involved( That is, Parc and Glaze), the option 2 is most likely.
2. Glaze will win because Glaze substantially performed and Parc prevented complete performance.
Explanation:
It is stated that Glaze was hired to remodel and furnish an office suite, after a submitted plans by Glaze were approved by Parc. It was further stated that the construction and painting had been done.
Although, with Glaze purchasing minor accessories which Parc rejected because they did not conform to the plans is a breach of contract, but that can be corrected by calling Glaze to order. However, it was Parc that refused to allow Glaze to make necessary corretion and complete the project and also refused to pay Glaze any part of the contract price.
Hey stop think go smoke easy up on the pain the smoke a calm u down I'k it's hard but I take them points now thanks
Answer:
The IRR (in %) for Project A is 31%.
Explanation:
Let IRR be x%
At IRR, present value of inflows = present value of outflows.
218917 = 25700/1.0x + 53000/1.0x^2 + 58000/1.0x^3 + 420,000/1.0x^4
solving for x, we find:
x = 31%
Therefore, The IRR (in %) for Project A is 31%.