Answer:
Amplification of the signal Epinephrine inhibits salivary gland activity and muscle cell contraction in the airways, yet stimulates glycogen release in muscle cells and heart muscle cell contraction.
Explanation:
Answer:
to help make smart responsible economic choices
Explanation:
Martin Luther King Jr was an African American de-segregationist who was one of the important leaders of the anti-slavery and anti-segregation movement.
<h3>The Albany Movement</h3>
This refers to the anti segregation movement which began in Albany, Georgia in the year 1961 as they led a national movement to try and end all forms of discrimination.
Please note that your question is incomplete so I gave you a general overview so that you could get a better understanding of the concept.
Read more about The Albany Movement here:
brainly.com/question/12048609
Answer:
The correct response is Option C: They do not seek to fundamentally alter the status quo.
Explanation:
The Shriners organization is not considered a social movement because there is no real drive to change society behind the organization. Shriners International grew out Freemasonry, which is the oldest, and most widely known fraternity in the world. The Masonic lodges were begun by craftsmen who gathered after work in shelter houses or lodges. Over time, the members organized into Masonic guilds and eventually other men who were not craftsmen were allowed to join. Shriners International began in 1872 and Masons who complete their final degree so they become Master Masons are then eligible to join Shriners International. Shriners abide by the same principles as Freemasonry, but they also promote fun and philanthropy.
Answer and Explanation:
1. Prosecutors may claim that the inaccurate report to which Rachel had access could induce misinterpretation on her part and that, in any case, Peter was already on the police for vandalism, which contributed to Rachel's conclusion. These justifications would not be successful, because Rachel had many ways to find out what actually happened to Peter.
2. Peter would sue Rachel for defamation and would likely succeed, as he has several witnesses that Rachel released incorrect information and that it affects his reputation.
3. The current malice is necessary in this case because Peter is a very well-known and popular person, and it is important that the current malice is inserted in the case, to speed up the process.
4. The fair report privilege can be used to protect Rachel, since the false information about Peter that she exposed, had as its only source a public document that induced her to publish the defamation.
