Answer:
c) Work provides people with life satisfaction.
Explanation:
According to Erik Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development, generativity contributing to the betterment of the world by making your mark by caring others and for the world.
It is the seventh stage in Erikson's hypothesis. During this stage, people live to create and and care for things that will continue to exist beyond their existence.
Work does not provide the need of generativity because people generally wok to have satisfaction of their life. Work fulfills their personal wants and desires and life's satisfaction
Hence the answer is ---
c) Work provides people with life satisfaction.
The answer is: [A]: "antisocial behavioral patterns may be learned" .
___________________________________________________________
Answer:
Sexual Harassment
Explanation:
There are still a lot of people in doubt about what is harassment and what is flirting, completely different things. Flirting, through affectionate nicknames like "sweetie" and "honey," doesn't have to end, it's true, but it's time for everyone to understand when the boundaries are being breached.
Everything that makes a person embarrassed can be widely considered harassment. Any interaction without consent that has libidinous ends can be considered a type of sexual violence. With this, we can conclude that Patricia is facing a sexual harassment situation, as she has repeatedly asked David to stop calling her "sweetie" and "honey," because she is embarrassed and demoralized, but David keeps calling Patricia like that.
By law, the crime of harassment only applies when there is a hierarchical relationship, as in schools and at work, and when embarrassment is reiterated.
Arguments that appear to be legitimate but are really founded on poor reasoning are known as logical fallacies. They could be the product of unintentional thinking mistakes or purposely employed to deceive others.
Taking logical fallacies at its value might cause to base our conclusions on weak arguments and result in poor decisions. Some of the text relies on the effectiveness of logical fallacies are :
- The Bandwagon Fallacy: Bandwagon fallacies, such as "three out of four individuals think X brand toothpaste cleans teeth best," are something that most of us expect to see in advertising; nonetheless, this fallacy may easily find its way into regular meetings and conversations.
- The Appeal to Authority Fallacy: Having an authoritative person support your claim might be a strong supplement to an existing argument, but it cannot be the main tenet of your case. Something is not always real just because a powerful person thinks it to be true.
- The False Dilemma Fallacy: The false dilemma fallacy claims that there are only two possible endings, which are mutually incompatible, rather than understanding that most (if not all) topics may be conceived of on a spectrum of options and perspectives.
- The Hasty Generalization Fallacy: This mistake happens when someone makes broad assumptions based on insufficient data. In other words, they ignore plausible counterarguments and make assumptions about the truth of a claim that has some, but insufficient, supporting evidence.
- The Slothful Induction Fallacy: This fallacy happens when there is enough logical evidence to conclude something is true, but someone refuses to admit it, instead attributing the result to coincidence or something completely unrelated.
- The Correlation Fallacy: If two things seem to be linked, it doesn't always follow that one of them caused the other indisputablelly. Even while it can seem like a straightforward fallacy to recognise, it can be difficult to do so in actual practise, especially if you truly want to uncover a link between two pieces of information to support your claim.
To learn more logical fallacies refer
brainly.com/question/18094137
#SPJ4
