A homologous mixture has the same composition throughout<span />
Answer:
I think the answer is C
Explanation:
I learned about this but not 100% sure if I'm right
Recognition by components (RBC) and feature integration theory (FIT) do a good job of explaining how perception works but fail in one important area. accounting for knowledge and experience. Option A
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
Recognition by components (RBC)?</h3>
Generally, Irving Biederman first suggested the recognition-by-components hypothesis, sometimes known as the RBC theory, in 1987 in an effort to provide an explanation for object recognition.
In conclusion, Both the recognition by components theory (RBC) and the feature integration theory (FIT) do a decent job of describing how perception works, but both of them fall short in one crucial area. taking into consideration one's acquired skills and experience Alternative A
Read more about Recognition by components (RBC)
brainly.com/question/5439846
#SPJ1
complete question
Recognition by components (RBC) and feature integration theory (FIT) do a good job of explaining how perception works, but fail in one important area. What is that area?
A. accounting for knowledge and experience
B. how specific features are used to combine into the objects that we perceive
C. the neurological pathway from the eye to the visual cortex
D. the neurology behind the dorsal and ventral streams
Answer:
natural and probable consequence
Explanation:
The <u>natural and probable consequence</u> doctrine provides that a person encouraging or facilitating the commission of a crime will be held liable as an accomplice for the crime he or she aided and abetted as well as for the crimes that are a likely and feasible outcome of the criminal conduct
.
The natural and probable consequence doctrine states that an individual who aided another in committing a crime is liable for the crime committed and also for other related crimes which resulted in the process of committing that crime. For example, if an individual aids another the crime of home invasion and in the process occupants of the house where assaulted, according to the natural and probable consequence doctrine, the abettor is guilty of home invasion, assault even though he/she was not physically involved in the assault.
