1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
cestrela7 [59]
3 years ago
13

Explain the following: if the government did not protect property rights under the rule of law, only the property of the wealthy

would be secure.
Social Studies
2 answers:
tangare [24]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:The majority of citizens depend on government protection and public enforcement to secure their rights. Only the wealthy can afford private protection services such as living in gated, security-patrolled communities or other ways of paying privately for enforcement of their property rights.

DaniilM [7]3 years ago
5 0

<em>The government protects property rights through fifth and fourteenth amendments through the due process clause</em>.

<u>EXPLANATION: </u>

Private property is protected by the government by which people can buy, sell, acquire, use property freely, legally and under law.The laws clearly define ownership and the owner is free to treat the property as he wishes.

The government can in no way deprive the individual of his property. Now, if these rights do not exist then some might try to gain political benefits out of the land illegally. So the property of both rich and poor peoples are secured by this law.

You might be interested in
Sociologists argue that what is considered deviant varies from culture to culture. Give an example of something that might be co
Mkey [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

<u>One of the examples of behavior that would be considered deviant in one society and not in the other is the eating of certain animals. The examples are:</u>

  • Some societies in India consider the cow a sacred animal and never would consume beef.
  • Muslim societies do not eat pork meat.
  • Insects are considered a tasty snack in many countries, including Thailand, while it would be considered gross by many people from the west.
  • While some of the western European countries (like France and Belgium) have specialized butcher shops and restaurants for horse meat, eating it would most likely be considered taboo in the US or UK.
  • The most radical example is the eating of dogs, which occurs in some Asian countries, most notably China. There is even a whole festival for dog meat consumption in Yulin, and every year there are protests across the globe because of this event. Slaughtering dogs for meat consumption is prohibited in the US and plenty of other countries.

<u>With all of this, we can conclude that some food consumption can be seen as deviant in some parts of the world, while in others it is a normal occurrence and part of the every-day diet.</u>

Despite various taboos and laws, what we have to understand is that our connection to the animals is culturally constructed. The fact that people of the US feel closer to dogs, cats, and horses, but not to sheep and pigs, is not the fact supported by nature. There is nothing in nature itself and the nutrition of horses, insects, and various other species that prevents us to eat them. These deviances surrounding different meats are all culturally constructed. <u>This does not mean they are less real or that we should eat all the animals, just that we have to realize that our ways are no naturally more or less right than someone else’s.</u>

4 0
3 years ago
The expression CaCo3 - CaO + CO2 is an example of a
antiseptic1488 [7]

Answer: chemical reaction

Explanation: It’s a equation

5 0
3 years ago
The kikuyu and Hutu are both from which linguistic group
exis [7]

Answer:

Bantu Speakers

5 0
3 years ago
(Consider This) For people that use commitment contracts to motivate achievement of a goal, people have the choice of their pena
Naya [18.7K]

Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss  aversion will provide additional motivation .

Options:

A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss

aversion will provide additional motivation

B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss

C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity

D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity

Explanation:

The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.

This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following people studied higher-level mental processes such as learning?
DerKrebs [107]
The answer is letter B. Plato studied higher-level mental processes such as learning in 287 B.C. Cognitive psychology is the study of mental processes like language use, perception, attention, problem solving, creativity and thinking. Plato said that the brain or mind is the center of all the mental processes.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Laurel is attending school in Japan for a semester. When she visited her host family, she quickly learned that it is bad manners
    13·1 answer
  • In Tim Burton's 1994 film Ed Wood, actor Vincent d'Onofrio plays the part of Orson Welles, but since d'Onofrio could not suitabl
    10·1 answer
  • . What is one right or freedom from the First Amendment?
    8·2 answers
  • The main purpose of the freedmens bureau was to
    9·2 answers
  • What did historian Tom Garner find in the Pensacola Bay area? Bead earrings Deer hides Piece of a jar from a Spanish colony Jour
    13·1 answer
  • Explain WHY the central region would favor the Central powers.
    15·1 answer
  • Karl and Elsa are parents who want to use learning principles to help their children learn responsibility. Specifically, they wo
    5·1 answer
  • Which of these steps is second in the blue-screen process?
    8·1 answer
  • Discuss the relation between individual and society​
    12·1 answer
  • Now that you have identified your position, you can explain the reasons for your ideas. Identify at least two reasons that suppo
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!