Answer:
In many ways, the U.S. and Texas Constitutions are similar documents. They both embody the principles of representative democratic government, in which sovereignty emanates from the people. Both contain a bill of rights that protects civil liberties from government infringement
Explanation:
He asserted that on the off chance that he did all that it would be useful for both the general population and him. He trusted that in the event that you are a government official, you work for yourself and to your greatest advantage. In the event that you figure out how to help yourself and in the meantime your kin and you nation, that would be the best, so being accessible for help was a political move that would help raise his rank, while likewise being valuable for the general population.
Answer:
Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) is a historical case examined by the Supreme Court. By a decision in this case, the court established that any evidence, whether confessing or exculpatory, can be used in court only if the prosecution can prove that the suspect was informed before the interrogation about the right to a lawyer and about the right not to testify against himself. At the same time, in case of refusal of the suspect from his rights, it is necessary to prove its voluntariness. The Miranda case set a precedent requiring all police departments to inform detainees of their rights to a lawyer and silence. These warnings are called the Miranda rule. The Supreme Court equated the Miranda Rule with constitutional acts.
Explanation:
