Answer:
1. $13,500
2. $13,500
3. $336,500
Explanation:
1. Bad debt expense:
= Sales × Percent of sales uncollectible
= $900,000 × 1.5%
= $13,500
Therefore, the bad debt expense for the year 2019 is $13,500.
2. Allowance for Doubtful accounts = $13,500
3. For the end of 2019, what is the company's net realizable value:
= Accounts receivable - Allowance for Doubtful accounts
= $350,000 - $13,500
= $336,500
The searching companies can work for equity or debt loans in order to raise money on global capital markets. The debt of a foreign institution, lender, and other debt suppliers is also an option to raise money in the capital market. As equity loans include the sale of equity to investors, the issue of bonds is part of debt loans. Capital costs are usually less than in the domestic market and the company can even borrow money from the bank. And enterprises need to be very careful to take into account the risk of adverse exchange rates because, if the peso is to be depreciated, they should be aware of the cost of acquiring the currency needed to repay a foreign exchange loan.
Moreover, foreign equity, floating foreign or Eurobonds offerings, or borrowing on the Euro currency markets may be considered by the Mexican firm. The euro currency market would then certainly provide the company with additional funding at a lower rate domestically. And if the peso decreases in the next 2 years, the company has to repay the credit in a different currency unless the company can use the future market. The value of euro currency loans would definitely be reduced.
We can recognize that the use of both foreign and euro bonds has the same disadvantages as the bonds have to be repaid in an anti-peso currency. The international bond market has important points that are worth considering, given the fewer regulations, disclosure requirements, and fiscal implications if the currency risk can be properly analyzed and minimized. Since the foreign equity market requires no payment to its stockholders and also has the greatest independence from its actions, it is perhaps the most attractive for the company. So, if the hesitations are to be overcome, investors will likely have loan strong growth prospects.
Learn more about loans here
brainly.com/question/25239160
#SPJ4
Answer:
Stock R more beta than Stock S = 4.2%
Explanation:
given data
Stock R beta = 1.8
Stock S beta = 0.75
expected rate of return = 9% = 0.09
risk-free rate = 5% = 0.05
solution
we get here Required Return
Required Return (Re) = risk-free rate + ( expected rate of return - risk-free rate ) beta ...........1
Required Return (Re) = 0.05 + ( 0.09 - 0.05 ) B
Required Return (Re) =
so here
Stock R = 0.05 + ( 0.09 - 0.05 ) 1.8
Stock R = 0.122 = 12.2 %
and
Stock S = 0.05 + ( 0.09 - 0.05 ) 0.75
Stock S = 0.08 = 8%
so here more risky stock is R and here less risky stock is S
Stock R is more beta than the Stock S.
Stock R more beta Stock S = 12.2 % - 8%
Stock R more beta Stock S = 4.2%
In the primary market investors buy securities directly from the company issuing them while the secondary market, investors trade securities among themselves, and the company with the security being traded does not participate in the transaction. Therefore, an example of a primary market transaction would be the sale of 1000 shares of newly issued stock by Alt Company to Miquel.
Answer:
the acid-test ratio is 1.5 times
Explanation:
The computation of the acid-test ratio is as follows:
Acid test Ratio = Quick assets ÷ current liabilities
where,
Quick Assets is
= Cash + short tern investments + Account receivable
= $3,500 + $50,000 + $56,000
= $109,500
And, the current liabilities is $73,000
So, the acid-test ratio is
= $109,500 ÷ $73,000
= 1.5 times
Hence, the acid-test ratio is 1.5 times