Answer:
The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."
The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true, then q is also correct or true.
And the converse of p → q can be shown as q → p.
But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.
In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be "A line can be a part of the ray".
So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.
Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.
Hence, Jahmiah is correct.
Answer:
She has approximately 3 pieces ( 2.625)
Step-by-step explanation:
To get the number of pieces, we need to divide the length of the wire by the individual length of the pieces.
To get the division done, it would be easier to convert what we have into improper fractions
For the piece of wire, the length which is 4 and 3/8 centimeters long will be 35/8 centimeters
while;
the individual length of each of the piece which is 1 and 2/3 centimeters long will be 5/3 centimeters
The number of pieces is thus 35/8 divided by 5/3 = 35/8 * 3/5 = 21/8 = 2.625 which is approximately 3 pieces
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is 9,960.
