I believe television is more effective than radio because, television provide a visual image of certain things, and people find visuals more appealing and favorite more than listening to someone speaking. The images tend to capture the mind of the viewer causing them to be more attracted to a certain thing, causing it to have a greater influence on public opinion. For example, If Pepsi chose to create an advertisement in a radio by just simply stating that it's refreshing and saying that you should buy it. But Coca Cola chose to make an ad on TV by showing people enjoying the drink by the pool in a summer day, you are more likely to chose Coke because it appealed to you more than Pepsi. So I think that's why Television is more effective in influencing public opinion than a radio.
Hope this helps you
Explanation:
The SMART in SMART goals stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-Bound. Defining these parameters as they pertain to your goal helps ensure that your objectives are attainable within a certain time frame.
The researchers found that the productivity of the more highly illuminated workers increased much more than that of the control group. They also found out that their productivity even improved when the lights were dimmed again. As a result, the researchers<span> concluded that it was not the changes in physical conditions that were affecting the workers' productivity. Rather, it was the fact that someone was actually concerned about their workplace.</span>
Answer:
B) systematic observation
Explanation:
The options for this question are missing. The options are:
A) self-report
B) systematic observation
C) sampling behavior with tasks
D) interview
In research, the term systematic observation refers to a process to get data by which t<u>he researcher makes observations of the subjects of the study in an objective way</u>, not considering the researcher own prejudices by collecting data without biases from the researcher (which would come from the interpretation of the observations).
In this example Irina watches 10 babies once a month from birth to 2 years of age and writes down the sounds they make and the words they use. We can see that <u>she is observing the babies in an objective and close way and by writing down the sounds and words she is actually taking an objective measure of language development</u>. Therefore this would be an example of systematic observation.
African society was torn apart by the slave trade
