Answer:
When exploration was starting in the West, many people were unsure if they wanted to join the journey. If I ran a cotton farm with my family, I would want to move to Texas for the major amounts of land that is fertile for my farm, the incredibly cheap prices of the land, and the easy travel (only two states in between Alabama and Texas). :)
Explanation:
The answer is Bronislaw Manilowski. His method of observation was called
participant observation where you try to live and be part of a group to
participate in their activities for a certain period of time. The goal is get to know these people and
better understand their behavior as well as their customs and traditions.
The correct answer is letter B.
Explanation: For Robert Merton, anomie is a state of aimlessness and loss of identity. A theory of anomie embedded in the so-called functionalist theories, which considers a society as an organic whole.
Answer: Chronosystem.
Urie Bronfenbrenner, an American psychologist, developed the Ecological Systems Theory as an explanation to how children interact with their environment and how in turn the environment affects the child’s development.
The first four levels of the system are:
Microsystem <em>(Immediate Environment)
</em>
Mesosystem <em>(Connections)
</em>
Exosystem <em>(Indirect Environment)
</em>
Macrosystem <em>(Social and Cultural Values)
</em>
The last system, which underlies all the other levels is the Chronosystem. This system introduces time to the theory. It includes changes over time in a small level (changes to family structure, changes in social circle) and changes at a social level (wars, recessions, etc.).
The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be informed of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights.
