Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
An inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning applies knowledge of past experiences and observations to form conclusions. The premise and conclusion goes "if this happened now... this must then happen". This type of reasoning moves from specific to general as opposed to deductive reasoning that moves from general to specific.
The argument in our question is also a fallacy. A fallacy is a faulty logic or weak argument. The argument is a fallacy of faulty generalization, the typical "jumping into conclusion".
Large scale farming helped in for law and government in Mesopotamia because the farming began an economy and value in the society
<span>I think d. The Greeks believed a good ruler was one who followed the gods' laws and treated his subjects with justice and kindness is the correct answer.
Hope this helps~</span>
One effect of newt Gingrich's contract with America was: Republicans took control of congress
The contract was signed in 1994, causing Republicans to took control on over 54 house and 9 senate seats, which make the Republican party took the majority seats of the congress.
Answer:
A) tests with a non-pathological focus
Explanation:
All tests mentioned above are not used to diagnose mental disability or any pathological disease. Rather than finding abnormality, the test focused more to quantify a certain characteristic that makes up personality . Many of the psychological tests is controversial since categorizing human personality is a complex and difficult thing to do. In spite of that, if used properly this test can help someone to know themself better.
