Answer:
C. "She should quote the second sentence directly, because it establishes important supporting evidence in a unique way."
Explanation:
I think this one is correct, however I am not positive, it's really just a guess. The first sentence is common knowledge and you shouldn't need to add what the readers already know if it's the main idea. The second sentence isn't necessarily common knowledge and should always be cited.
Hope this helped, let me know if it's right or not.
<span>"Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious" is, in fact, a word. It means sublime, or wonderful.
</span><span><span>Please take the time to rate and thank me if you feel I helped with these questions! Thank you, it helps me a lot. :) </span>
</span>
No. "Children in the dark make mistakes" does not have the same meaning as "Mistakes in the dark make children." The first implies that without sufficient light, children would make mistakes, while the second implies that if you make mistakes in the dark, you'll have children.
The opposite of this sentence: "Children in the dark make mistakes", should be "Mistakes are made when Children are in a dark area".
hope this helps
The correct answer is B. Finally, I stood still, listening to the barely audible whoosh- whoosh- whoosh from the propellers.
Explanation
Sounds can be represented linguistically through words, this resource is known as onomatopoeia. Onomatopoeia is the use of letters to form words in the language itself to imitate certain non-verbal sounds, such as the sounds of animals, natural phenomena, impacts, devices, etc. Therefore, the correct answer is B. "Finally I stood still, listening to the barely audible whoosh- whoosh- whoosh from the propellers" because in this sentence the onomatopoeia "whoosh" is used to express the sound of the birds.
Answer:
What math , science, history ??
