Answer: emphasize the direction component of motivation
Explanation:
Content theories, also known as needs theories, focus on what motivates people, what their needs in relation to the motivation they have to fulfill those needs.
Since content Theories focus on the content of the motivating factors, the most important component analyzed is direction, meaning what a subject wants to achieve.
Persistence refers to the amount of time a person will keep trying to achieve that goal, and intensity refers to the amount of effort the person is willing to make, but neither of these is the main focus of Content theories.
Answer:
I should lie down for half hour after eating.
Explanation:
A pregnant patient who is 30 weeks gone and thinks she should lie down half hour after meal will lead to a serious heartburn.
The required time frame to lie down after eating or for going to bed aftet eating is 3 hours, this will help to control your heartburn.
Also the nurse should teach the patient of the need to sit up while eating as this will also aid the food move down better, hence reducing the instance of heartburn.
Answer:
Bearing in mind that it was Davidson that recommended the rope while stating the specific of the rope. The specifics of the rope would be considered facts, it is this facts that the court would find to be bounded to the warranty. On his part, Moon only stated the fact that he needs rope for his farm, but does not specify what he needs it for. The recommendation by Davidson for that specific rope is based only on the details that it would be used for the farm. This is pointing that, Moon is relying entirely on the seller, who knows about the product, to recommend him a type of rope.
However, there is need to put into consideration that Moon does not specify the exact use of the rope. This implies that Davidson states the he recommends the use of that specific rope.
With the argument back and forth between seller and buyer, there is no warranty at the instance that the seller breached an implied warranty of merchantability, but one can argue there was a
breach of implied warranty of particular purpose if it is taken into consideration that the use of that particular rope is not usually used in farms.
Explanation:
See answer
