The right of access to the courts is indeed but one aspect of the <u>right to petition.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
When the constitution is looked into, it is revealed that the right to access to the courts is nothing but one of the aspects of the First Amendment’s right to petition the government for redress of one’s grievances. This can be easily seen as it is stated here, similar philosophy governs the approach of groups or citizens to administrative agencies which can both be seen as creatures of the legislature, and limbs of the executive, and to all the courts which are the third branch of the government.
Thus, it is more than implied that the right of petition is extended to all departments of the government including the courts. Thus, making it an aspect of the "right to petition".
Write an opening statement that describes a policy approach for a presidential candidate<span>. ... Your job is to </span>write an opening statement that describes<span> the </span>candidate's approach<span> to solving a major issue in education: the rising cost of college. I hope this helps you out have an amazing dat!!!!</span>
Answer:
Each had an executive; most had a two-house legislature. They were different because they were new states were self-governing, had constitutions/bills of rights, and allowed more people to vote.
Answer:
he perfected a horse drawn seed drill in 1700 that economically sowed the seeds in neat rows
Explanation:
<span>For the answer to the question above, it is A stronger central government was necessary to maintain order. It is a </span><span>convention that drew up the </span>Constitution of the United States<span>. Stimulated by severe economic troubles, which produced radical political movements such as </span>Shays<span>’s Rebellion, and urged on by a demand for a stronger central government, the convention met in the Pennsylvania State House in </span>Philadelphia.
