Answer: The answers are provided below.
Explanation:
1. A payoff matrix is a table whereby strategies of one player are listed in the rows and the strategies of the other player is listed in the columns while the cells show the payoffs to each player in such a way that the payoff of the row player is first listed.
The payoff matrix for this game has been attached.
2. In game theory, a strategic dominance occurs when a strategy is better than the strategy of another player. In this scenario, even does not have a dominant strategy because both strategies are providing equal payoffs for the pure strategy.
The option that best describes the difference between HR planning and a staffing plan is this:
B. Unlike HR planning, a staffing plan identifies only the company's present hiring needs.
<h3>What is the difference between HR planning and staffing?</h3>
The difference between the two mentioned concepts lies in the fact that HR planning is a long-term plan that is aimed at trying to understand how the staffing needs of the company can be improved for better success.
Unlike HR planning, a staffing plan is aimed at identifying the immediate employment needs of the company and filling them up. In businesses, HR planning is very vital to building sustainability. Staffing is also important but it only considers the interim.
So, the difference between these two concepts can be pinned down to the time factor. While one satisfies a need immediately, the other looks at the future and makes reasonable plans that ensure sustainability.
Learn more about HR planning here:
brainly.com/question/13761208
#SPJ1
Answer:<em>True cost =
</em>
<em>=
</em>
<em>= $ 13,669,821.2</em>
Explanation:
Given :
Debt-Equity ratio = 0.55
Flotation cost for new equity = 6%
Flotation cost for debt = 3 %
∴ To compute the weighted flotation cost , we'll use the following formula:
Weighted Flotation cost =![\left [ \frac{1}{1+Debt-Equity ratio}\times Flotation cost of equity \right ] + \left [ \frac{Debt-Equity ratio}{1+Debt-Equity ratio}\times Flotation cost of debt \right ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B1%2BDebt-Equity%20ratio%7D%5Ctimes%20Flotation%20cost%20of%20equity%20%5Cright%20%5D%20%2B%20%5Cleft%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7BDebt-Equity%20ratio%7D%7B1%2BDebt-Equity%20ratio%7D%5Ctimes%20Flotation%20cost%20of%20debt%20%5Cright%20%5D)
= ![\left [ \frac{1}{1+0.55}\times 0.06 \right ] + \left [ \frac{0.55}{1+0.55}\times 0.03 \right ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B1%2B0.55%7D%5Ctimes%200.06%20%5Cright%20%5D%20%2B%20%5Cleft%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B0.55%7D%7B1%2B0.55%7D%5Ctimes%200.03%20%5Cright%20%5D)
= 0.0387 + 0.0106
= 0.04934 or 4.93%
The true cost of building the new assembly line after taking flotation costs into account is evaluated using the following formula :
True cost = 
= 
= $ 13,669,821.2