1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
valina [46]
3 years ago
15

How did the decision in Miranda v. Arizona impact the rights of Seibert?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Delvig [45]3 years ago
5 0
The police captured Seibert, yet did not read her rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436. At the police headquarters, Officer Hanrahan scrutinized her for 30 to 40 minutes, getting an admission that the arrangement was for Donald to bite the dust in the fire.
You might be interested in
Tell Jen what to ask herself when determining if the document ethically represents the company.​
aliina [53]

Answer :

Jen should ask herself "What does the company consider ethical?" "What is the companies personal morals?" "How do these ethics contribute to the companies success?" "How does this document represent the companies ethics, what is similar?"

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
The president’s __________ is an advisory body of 16 or more members whose purpose is to advise the president on any subject nee
Wittaler [7]
The answer is... cabinet
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the difference between an autocracy and an oligarchy
eduard

Answer:

Autocracy and Oligarchy

Explanation:

The autocracy form of government is characterized by the presence of a single leader or individual who rules the people. it is also refereed in some cases where a military dictator rules the country an individual running the country

where as OLIGARCHY refers to control of small groups or organization over the government policies and procedures that how it should be conducted and controlled

5 0
2 years ago
Assume labor and capital are the only two inputs. Digitopolis is a capital-abundant country that produces personal computers and
chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

Following the Ricardian Model of Comparative Advantage, <u>both Digitopolis and the labor-abundant country will specialize at producing  what each does best, according to its factors endowment.</u>

This means that <u>Digitopolis will shift its production to computers</u> as it is a capital intensive activity and <u>its opportunity cost </u>for computers production is lower,<u> while the second country, being labor-abundant, will specialize on producing fax machines.</u>

Explanation:

The Ricardian Model of Comparative Advantage assumes that countries benefit from international trade as they will specialize in producing goods where they hold comparative advantage, that is, where their opportunity cost is lower. The opportunity cost describes the trade-off between choosing to produce one good or the other based on inputs availability and efficiency. In this case, capital is abundant in Digitopolis, so it is evident that the opportunity cost of shifting output to a capital-intensive industry (computers) will be less than producing labor-intensive goods (fax machines).

Being a capital-abundant country, for Digitopolis the opportunity cost of producing fax machines is higher than for producing computers, so it is less efficient for this country to focus on producing fax machines. <u>Thus, it will be more productive that it specializes on producing computers. </u>

On the other hand, considering that the second country is labor-abundant, it is better that it specializes on producing fax machines, as its opportunity cost here is lower.

Finally, <u>both countries will benefit from trade</u>, as overall production of computers and fax machines will increase. Digitopolis will produce much more computers and the second country more fax machines than in the pre-trade situation, because both countries will be employing their inputs more efficiently and productivity will increase.

5 0
3 years ago
Anne hutchinson's trial demonstrated that: she wanted to give the native americans land. church elders lacked tolerance. she wan
butalik [34]
Anne hutchinson's trial demonstrated that "church elders lacked tolerance."

Hutchinson's church trial started on March 15, 1638 at her home church in Boston. During this, the leaders of the church attempted to motivate her to apologize and admit her mistakes however to no avail,they read the charges against Hutchinson and endeavored to inspire her to concede they were blunders yet she stayed disobedient.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A) What is Loktantra? Write down two characteristics of it.​
    13·1 answer
  • Tia has always been a capable student who is aware of her strengths and limitations. she is kind to her friends and family and s
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELPPP!!!!!!!!!!!! ILL MAKE BRAINLIST
    14·1 answer
  • Comprehension Questions:
    6·1 answer
  • A conclusion about why it was destiny for the U.S to expand west?
    14·1 answer
  • Social security number is an example of a.a numerical variable. b.a categorical variable. c.either a numerical or a categorical
    9·1 answer
  • Explain how the federal government could be characterized as offering forms of “insurance.” Introduce the subject. Make two poin
    15·1 answer
  • What does O’Sullivan mean when he says “Providence is with us.”
    8·1 answer
  • Pause in the video
    12·1 answer
  • Within how many days following the acceptance must escrow receive a copy of the purchase agreement. According to section 20 of t
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!