All categories

3 years ago

-2 equals 4+x divided by 2

Mathematics

1 answer:

Colt1911 [192]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

A) -8

Step-by-step explanation:

First lets plug in -8

-2= 4 + x /2

-2= 4 + (-8) /2

-2= -4/2

-2= -2

That is a true statement so now we know X= -8

Hope this helped! Have a good/night!

You might be interested in

Estimate the sum 9/50 + 7/15 A.0 B.1/2 C.1

vladimir1956 [14]

9/50 is close to 10/50 or 1/5 or 0.2
7/15 is close to 7/14 or 1/2 or 0.5
0.2 + 0.5 = 0.7
0.7 is closer to 0.5 than 1
The answer would be B

3 0

3 years ago

Question 4*

inessss [21]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Mark raises guppies in an aquarium. He finds out that guppies reproduce very rapidly, and the number quadruples every month. He

Andrews [41]

For this case what we should know is that the function that best adapts to this problem is given by:
y = 2 * (4) ^ x
The graph of the function is shown for two different intervals:
A small interval of -1.5 to 0.5
A larger interval of -6.5 to 6.5.
In both intervals the exponential growth of the function is demonstrated.
Answer:
See attached image.

7 0

3 years ago

The pattern 2, 5, 17, ________, ________ follows the rule multiply by 4, then subtract 3. What are the next two terms?

vitfil [10]

Answer:

None of the answer choices.

Step-by-step explanation:

The pattern to this problem is multiply by 4, and subtract 3. However when doing 17 * 4, you get 68. Look how both of the answer chouces start with 68, and we haven't even subtracted 3 yet. This shows that the answer choices are wrong.

Correct Answer: 65, 257

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A data mining routine has been applied to a transaction dataset and has classified 88 records as fraudulent (30 correctly so) an

chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

The classification matrix is attached below

Part a

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is 65.91%.

Part b

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is 96.64%

Step-by-step explanation:

The classification matrix is obtained as shown below:

The transaction dataset has 30 fraudulent correctly classified records out of 88 records, that is, 30 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is negative.

Also, there would be 88 - 30 = 58 non-fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 58 records are incorrectly predicted given that an instance is positive.

The transaction dataset has 920 non-fraudulent correctly classified records out of 952 records, that is, 920 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is positive.

Also, there would be 952 - 920 = 32 fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 32 records incorrectly predicted given that an instance is negative.

That is,

Predicted value

Active value Fraudulent Non-fraudulent

Fraudlent 30 58

non-fraudulent 32 920

The classification matrix is obtained by using the information related to the transaction data, which is classified into fraudulent records and non-fraudulent records.

The error rate is obtained as shown below:

The error rate is obtained by taking the ratio of $\left( {b + c} \right)(b+c)$ and the total number of records.

The classification matrix is, shown above

The total number of records is, $30 + 58 + 32 + 920 = 1,040$

The error rate is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\{\rm{Error}}\,{\rm{rate}} = \frac{{b + c}}{{{\rm{Total}}}}\\\\ = \frac{{58 + 32}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = \frac{{90}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = 0.0865\\\end{array}$

The percentage is $0.0865 \times 100 = 8.65$

(a)

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained by taking the rate ratio of b and $\left( {a + b} \right)(a+b)$ .

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown above and in the attachment

The error rate for truly fraudulent is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\FP = \frac{b}{{a + b}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{30 + 58}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{88}}\\\\ = 0.6591\\\end{array}$

The percentage is, $0.6591 \times 100 = 65.91$

(b)

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained by taking the ratio of d and $\left( {c + d} \right)(c+d)$ .

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown in the attachment

The error rate for truly non-fraudulent is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\TP = \frac{d}{{c + d}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{32 + 920}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{952}}\\\\ = 0.9664\\\end{array}$

The percentage is, $0.9664 \times 100 = 96.64$

8 0

3 years ago