<u> Allele frequencies to change from one generation to the next.-</u>
<u>B. </u><u>Mutation</u><u>; C. Random genetic drift; D. </u><u>Migration</u><u>; F. Natural selection</u>
- Selection, mutation, migration, and genetic drift are the mechanisms that effect changes in allele frequencies.
- When one or more of these forces are acting, the population violates Hardy-Weinberg assumptions, and evolution occurs.
Why do allele frequencies change from one generation to the next?
Random selection: Allele frequencies may fluctuate from one generation to the next when people with particular genotypes outlive those with different genotypes.
No mutation: Allele frequencies may fluctuate from one generation to the next if new alleles are produced via mutation or if alleles mutate at different rates.
What are 5 factors that cause changes in allele frequency?
- A population, a collection of interacting individuals of a single species, exhibits a change in allele frequency from one generation to the next due to five main processes.
- These include natural selection, gene flow, genetic drift, and mutation.
Learn more about allele frequency
brainly.com/question/7719918
#SPJ4
<u>The complete question is -</u>
Identify the evolutionary forces that can cause allele frequencies to change from one generation to the next. Check all that apply
A. Inbreeding
B. Mutation,
C. random genetic drift
D. migration
E. extinction
F. natural selection
Answer:
B: an atom
Explanation:
An atom is the smallest substance that can exist in isolation.
Hence, if a piece of copper is continually divided, eventually the smallest particle you would get in an atom.
The endosymbiotic theory hypothesizes that mitochondria and chloroplasts were formed when <u>prokaryotic </u>cells were engulfed by larger cells that were precursors to <u>eukaryotic </u>cells.
prokaryotic ; eukaryotic
uhm, though the graph doesn't match the problem, I remember doing this when I was in bio. If you are looking for the genome, it would be something along the lines of Gg, or GG (G=green dominant, g=yellow recessive)
I hope this is what you need!
That they are both theories of evolutionary change, but the tempo of the change is different enough that we have the two theories. Rapid evolutionary change punctuated with long periods of stasis describes the former while gradual and incremental change over long periods is the description of the later. Natural selection seems to be more important in gradualism than punctuation, but this is <span>a murky area that is argued about often.</span>
