The answer to the question above is option C: they can result in a channel member having too much control. Firstly, we define what vertical system is. From the term itself vertical, the formation of the members is from top to bottom. Therefore, this includes the <span>producer, wholesaler, and retailer and this is where the distribution channel occurs. The reason why this kind of system is a business ethic issue is due to channel members that might have too much control because of their positions and unequal distribution of tasks. </span>
Answer:
The correct answer is option a.
Explanation:
Taxes levied on either buyers or sellers are equivalent. In both cases, the tax creates a wedge. This wedge is the difference between the price that the buyers have to pay and the price that the sellers receive.
The price that the buyers have to pay increases while the price that the sellers receive decreases. But this tax wedge does not depend on whom the tax is levied, it depends on the elasticity of demand and supply. So whether the tax is levied on buyers or sellers, the tax wedge will remain the same.
The tax burden will be shared between both buyers and sellers. So it is incorrect to say that the taxes levied on sellers and taxes levied on buyers are not equivalent.
<span>The answer to this
question is False. Sanctions do not only rarely achieve their goal of forcing
change in the targeted country, but they also tend to produce collateral
economic damage in the nations that do apply them.</span>
People and procedures for assessing information needs, developing the needed information, and helping decision makers use the information. Hope it is helpful. Peace✌️
