1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olga55 [171]
3 years ago
11

Help this is to confusing

Mathematics
1 answer:
maw [93]3 years ago
4 0
What is presented here is an example of a two-column proof, where one side lists the steps in the order in which the author worked and the parallel side explaining the reason behind each step. In the first example, it shows that the equation is given because we did not need any sort of thinking to come to the conclusion that 2/3y +15 = 9. The second step is actually Subtraction of Equality because we are subtracting the integer 15 from both sides, therefore both sides are still equal.

In the third step, the reason provided is simplification. We can infer that this means we will need to combine like terms since the step before has like terms (15 and -15, 9 and -15). If we combine these terms we get 2/3y = -6. 

The fourth step of action we can probably take from step three, is to multiply both sides by 3 in order to eliminate the denominator. With that we get, 2y = -18 and can be justified by simplification.

The final step calls for simplification, meaning all we have to do is either add, subtract, divide, or multiply both sides by the same number. We are solving for y, so in order to get y alone we must divide both sides by 2. This is to get rid of any coefficient of the y variable. The final step of this proof is y = -9

Hope this helps!
You might be interested in
Which expression is equivalent to ³✓x⁵y? <br>•x⁵/³y<br>• x⁵/³y⅓ <br>•x⅗y <br>•x⅗y³​
Aliun [14]

Answer:

x⁵/³y

Step-by-step explanation:

x⁵/³y is equivalent to ³✓x⁵y.

3 0
2 years ago
Police Chase: A speeder traveling 40 miles per hour (in a 25 mph zone) passes a stopped police car which immediately takes off a
zubka84 [21]

Answer:

a. 18.34 s b. 327.92 m

Step-by-step explanation:

a. How long before the police car catches the speeder who continued traveling at 40 miles/hour

The acceleration of the car a in 10 s from 0 to 55 mi/h is a = (v - u)/t where u = initial velocity = 0 m/s, v = final velocity = 55 mi/h = 55 × 1609 m/3600 s = 24.58 m/s and t = time = 10 s.

So, a =  (v - u)/t =  (24.58 m/s - 0 m/s)/10 s = 24.58 m/s ÷ 10 s = 2.458 m/s².

The distance moved by the police car in 10 s is gotten from

s = ut + 1/2at² where u = initial velocity of police car = 0 m/s, a = acceleration = 2.458 m/s² and t = time = 10 s.

s = 0 m/s × 10 s + 1/2 × 2.458 m/s² (10)²

s = 0 m + 1/2 × 2.458 m/s² × 100 s²

s = 122.9 m

The distance moved when the police car is driving at 55 mi/h is s' = 24.58 t where t = driving time after attaining 55 mi/h

The total distance moved by the police car is thus S = s + s' = 122.9 + 24.58t

The total distance moved by the speeder is S' = 40t' mi = (40 × 1609 m/3600 s)t' =  17.88t' m where t' = time taken for police to catch up with speeder.

Since both distances are the same,

S' = S

17.88t' = 122.9 + 24.58t

Also, the time  taken for the police car to catch up with the speeder, t' = time taken for car to accelerate to 55 mi/h + rest of time taken for police car to catch up with speed, t

t' = 10 + t

So, substituting t' into the equation, we have

17.88t' = 122.9 + 24.58t

17.88(10 + t) = 122.9 + 24.58t

178.8 + 17.88t = 122.9 + 24.58t

17.88t - 24.58t = 122.9 - 178.8

-6.7t = -55.9

t = -55.9/-6.7

t = 8.34 s

So, t' = 10 + t

t' = 10 + 8.34

t' = 18.34 s

So, it will take 18.34 s before the police car catches the speeder who continued traveling at 40 miles/hour

b. how far before the police car catches the speeder who continued traveling at 40 miles/hour

Since the distance moved by the police car also equals the distance moved by the speeder, how far the police car will move before he catches the speeder is given by S' = 17.88t' = 17.88 × 18.34 s = 327.92 m

4 0
2 years ago
Write this statement as a conditional statement in the form “if p, then q.”
ss7ja [257]

Answer:

if the measure of an angle is 90°, then the angle is a right angle.

Step-by-step explanation:

p=the measure of an angle is 90°

q=the angle is a right angle

p is the hypothesis of the conditional statement

q is the conclusion of the conditional statement

5 0
2 years ago
Decide whether each relation defines y as a function of x. Give the domain and range.
lisov135 [29]
Y=x².

This is te function of a parabola open upward

the domain is all values of x ={x/x∈z}
7 0
3 years ago
Lillian me made 6 out of every 10 baskets she attempted during basketball practice. If she attempted 25 baskets how many did she
Olegator [25]
14 or 15 is the answer i believe 

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Suppose that in 2005, 894,700 citizens died of a certain disease. Assuming the population of the country us 302 million, what wa
    6·1 answer
  • Jim Tree borrowed $1,000 at 10 percent for one year. He paid a $45 processing fee and $100 in interest. Thus, the finance charge
    11·1 answer
  • Evaluate the following expression 2^-2
    9·1 answer
  • How do you round an irrational number to the nearest hundredth
    5·1 answer
  • Can you answer this Q plzz?
    8·1 answer
  • Solve for the variable <br> 10 + 25a = 75<br><br><br><br><br><br> Please help
    15·2 answers
  • M.c.m (35;50)<br>m.c.d (35;50)<br>m.c.m (116;92)<br>m.c.d (116;92)​
    7·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!!fast!!!!!!
    14·2 answers
  • Find the coordinates of the intersection of the diagonals of the parallelogram with the vertices Q(-1,3), R(5,2), S(1, - 2), and
    15·1 answer
  • The cube root is the same as______
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!