By ruling in james mcculloch’s favor in mcculloch v. Maryland, what was the verdict of this case

Law

1 answer:

andrew11 [14]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

McCulloch v. Maryland was a decision of the United States Supreme Court. The state of Maryland attempted to prevent a branch of the Second Bank of the United States from operating by imposing a tax on all banknotes of banks not founded in Maryland. The Second Bank of the United States was the only bank then present in the state that had not been founded on it. The Court invoked the Theory of Implicit Powers of the Constitution, which allowed the Federal Government to pass laws that are not expressly provided for in the Constitution, from a list of expressed powers, provided that those laws are useful for Congress's powers, pursuant to Constitution.

You might be interested in

Is it illegal to hold a protest on school grounds while school is in session

hammer [34]

I don’t think so,my class went on strike whilst others were in class

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeessssssss

Art [367]

Yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesssssssssssssss

3 0

3 years ago

What physical property can help characterize fragments of glass at a crime scene?

icang [17]

Answer:

Here is your answer .

Explanation:

Refractive index is mostly commonly measured property in the forensic examination of glass fragments (koons etal. 2002), because:precise refractive indices can be measured rapidly on the small fragments typically found in casework.

6 0

3 years ago

Which rank does David seem to hold in the given scenario? David works in the police force. He is mainly in charge of crime preve

Agata [3.3K]

Answer:An undercover detective

Explanation:Undercover detective are involved in cre prevention detection by making sure that they bring down what ever organization that are involved in criminal activities. They get into those organization and find all the evidence on every thing that they are doing illegally and they take part in arresting these criminals

7 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is NOT a reason for implementing Intermediate Sanctions?

tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

Answer: Lack of evidence that the offender was actually guilty

Explanation:

Intermediate sanctions do not involve the person going to prison but they are quite intrusive as they include (but are not limited to): intensive supervision and electronic monitoring. Most people believe they should be used as punishment for nonviolent <u>crime</u>.

The keyword above is ''crime''. If there is a lack of evidence that a person committed a crime then they are presumed innocent which means they did not commit the crime in question and so do not qualify for intermediate sanctions.

3 0

3 years ago