As the options are not included with this question, we cannot chose a particular statement. Nevertheless, we are able to explain what the Supreme Court has ruled when it comes to the constitutional requirements of confinement.
The first case that addressed such conditions was that of <em>Holt v. Sarver</em>, in 1970. This was the first in a series of common law cases that found state prison systems to violate the Eighth Amendment. This amendment prohibits the use of cruel and unusual punishment.
This series of cases established that confinement should not include the unnecessary infliction of pain, nor should conditions be grossly disproportionate to the severity of the crime warranting imprisonment. The restrictions placed on prisoners can be restrictive, and even harsh, but should not become cruel. This includes the display of deliberate indifference in emergencies on the part of officials, or malicious and sadistic acts.
Answer:
Rights of women are:
Safe motherhood.
Equal participation in politics and work.
Rights of children are:
Right for food, shelter, education etc.
Right of entertainment.
Answer:
If the official treaty of the declaration of intemperance isn't multiplied by the diameter of the radius x would be 46 and be subtracted by i.
Explanation:
Lemme break It down to you on foe nem
If the quadrilateral starts in the circumference of the radius the convention source of law wouldn't be able to be multiplied by 6 x 2q unless it is stuck under a bush where I hide my squirrels at.
Other than that you would only get the 42 minus x equals 89 if the declaration independence qualifies as 22986.
Hope this helped
Answer:
if yes, i would say a cold soup maybe lol and can i have brainliest pls thanks?
Explanation:
I thought you said “goodnight”...... but ye this is me (from like 3 months ago lol)
