<span>North america is about 80% urbanized. this mean that about 75% of north american people live in cities. also the population is very less compared to the land area. May be people would prefer to live in urban areas rather living in rural or forest areas. this condition is helpful in preserving forest and natural resources. the only problem is the quality of living in urban areas will be poor compared to rural areas.</span>
Answer: The cases in which the Review Commission renders decisions arise from inspections conducted by a Federal agency separate from the Review Commission, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), which is a part of the Department of Labor. OSHRC, or the Review Commission, and OSHA were created by the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, but the Act mandated that the Review Commission be an independent agency (i.e., not part of another Federal department) to ensure that parties to agency cases receive impartial hearings.
Explanation:
401k is an investment account that you can use to save your paycheck from your work. Most employers provide this.
A 529 is also another good investment for saving up for college as there are no taxes applied to the investment or income as long as it is used for schooling.
A HSA plan is able to accumulate value for a future health purchase and is also usually taken out of your paycheck. Taxes do not apply so you get the full value of the amount you decide to set aside.
1) Town of Bayport:
We have that the residents value the fireworks at
a total of 50+100+300=450$. That is the utility they gain. But they
would also have to pay 360$ for the fireworks. The total outcome is
450$+(-360$)=90$. Hence, the outcome is positive and the fireworks pass
the cost benefit analysis.
If the fireworks' cost is to be split
equally, we have that each of the 3 residents has to pay 360/3=120$. Let
us now do the cost-benefit analysis for everyone.
Jacques stands to gain 50$ from the fireworks but would have to pay 120$. He will vote against it.
Also, Kyoko will gain 100$ but would have to pay 120$. He will lose utility/money from this so he will vote against.
Musashi on the other hand, would gain 300$ and only pay 120$. He is largely benefitted by this measure. Only he would
We have that 2 out of the 3 would vote against the fireworks, so that the fireworks will not be bought. The vote does not yield the same answer as the benefit-cost analysis.
2) Town of River Heights:
We have that the total value of the fireworks to the community
is 20+140+160=320$. The total value of the fireworks is lower than
their cost so their cost benefit analysis yields that they should not be
bought.
However, let's see what each resident says. The cost to each resident is 360/3=120$. Rina is against the fireworks since she will only gain 20$. Sean and Yvette are for the fireworks since they gain 140$ and 160$ respectively, which are larger than the cost of the fireworks to each of them (120$). Hence, 2 will vote for the fireworks and one will vote against and fireworks will be bought.
Again, the vote clashes with the cost-benefit analysis.
3) The first choice is wrong. It is very difficult for a government to provide the exact types of public goods that everyone wants because that would be too costly; one cannot have a public good that everyone pays for so that only a couple of people enjoy it. In our example, we saw that in every case, a public good and its production would have sime supporters and some adversaries.
Majority rule is not always the most efficient way to decide public goods; as we have seen in the second case, the cost-benefit analysis yields that the fireworks are not worth it but they are approved by the majority nonetheless.
The final sentence is correct. The differing preferences of the people make a clearcut choice impossible and the government has to take into account various tradeoffs and compromises in order to determine which public goods to provide.
The answer is <u>"Analyzing the organization and the environment".</u>
<u></u>
SWOT analysis refers to an important tool that helps organizations or businesses in the assessment and revelation period of strategic planning. Since it gives an inside and out perspective on the present and forward-looking circumstance of a business, the term SWOT is frequently connected with strategic planning. Both assume a vital job in the high-level planning of businesses as they include imperative information, which once recognized and analyzed, can accomplish long term business development and achievement. However, they are connected, the two ideas are distinctive components during the process of business planning.
