For a triangle, there is a proven inequality<span> that states that</span><span>, the sum of the lengths of any two sides must be greater than or equal to the length of the remaining side
21 + 37 >= 15
58 >= 15
21 + 15 >= 37
36 >= 37
37 + 15 >= 21
52 >= 21
We can see that the second inequality doesn't comply, thus there is not such triangle.</span>
Answer:
it will be (2,-3)
Step-by-step explanation:
hsvs hs sdbd. dvd d d dvd dbdbdg
Answer:
![\sqrt[3]{62}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B62%7D)
is closest to 4.
Step-by-step explanation:
Our approach consist in comparing the given cubic root with respect to other two cubic roots consecutive to each other and whose result is an integer. The following condition must be satisfied:
![n < \sqrt[3]{62} < n+1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=n%20%3C%20%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B62%7D%20%3C%20n%2B1)
If 
, then the simultaneous inequation is observed:
Since 62 is closer to the upper bound, then is closest to 4.
