Answer:
Привет! Кто-нибудь читал Криспину крест ведущего? Если да, то может ли кто-нибудь дать мне представление о том, как он изменился в этой истории! Спасибо за ваше время!
Explanation:
The correct answer is "Criterion validity."
The option that determines this relationship is <em>criterion validity.</em>
When using criterion validity, Patagonia tries to assess a potential employee’s capability within the standards of the organization. The managers of the company want to determine how well they predict a potential employee’s actual job performance based on scores on the employee’s selection procedure.
This statistical method -criteria validity- tries to identify how well a measure validates or predicts an outcome of another measure. In a company, the Human Resources Department applies this test to a candidate as part of the interview mechanism to confirm that he/she would be the right candidate for the job.
Answer:
<u>Positive reinforcement</u>
Explanation:
Positive reinforcement: In psychology, the term "positive reinforcement" is determined as a phenomenon in which an individual is being provided with something when he or she performs a specific "desired action or task" in order to get associated with the given reward and perform the task or action in future. Thus, in the given scenario reward is considered as a "reinforcing stimulus".
<u>In the question above, the correct answer is positive reinforcement.</u>
Answer:
Inadmissible, because prior bad acts cannot be admitted to prove the defendant's propensity to commit the specific crime with which he is charged
Explanation:
Evidence
This is refered to as a group or a collective mass of things such as testimony and exhibits etc.
Trier of law helps to know what laws apply to the case, decides on what evidence is admissible, reviews written briefs submitted by both sides, gives legal points and authories relevant to the decision etc.
The role of prosecutor
They are responsible for filing of charges, trials, and appeals, review the actions of police officers, make judgements on whether they were appropriate etc.
The role of defense is responsible for trial strategy.
The evidence is admissible in court are only important evidence related to its admissible in court. In some few cases, relevant evidence will not be admitted in court.
A relevant evidence is inadmissible if it one is when the evidence found is in violation of the defendants constitutional rights or violations of the hearsay rule that state that information is opportuned.etc.
