<span>True, because if they take a check, they may be cheated because the check has an expiration date, and the credit card does not
</span>
Answer:C
Explanation: Provide a link to show how brighten a room is
A.) personal income
with you using your own money nothing deducts or raises money for rent or wage.
Answer:
1. $28,800
$103,200
2. $28,800
$103,200
3. $86,400
$45,600
Explanation:
1. The dividend paid to preferred stockholders = Shares × Par value × Percentage
= 3,000 shares × $120 × 8%
= $28,800
The dividend paid to Common stockholders = Cash dividend - Dividend paid to preferred stockholders
= $132,000 - $28,800
= $103,200
2. The dividend paid to preferred stockholders = Shares × Par value × Percentage
Note :- Because preferred stocks are non-cumulative in nature, the company is not allowed to pay last two years' dividends and preferred stocks are liable for payment only for the current year.
= 3,000 shares × $120 × 8%
= $28,800
The dividend paid to Common stockholders = Cash dividend - Dividend paid to preferred stockholders
= $132,000 - $28,800
= $103,200
3. The dividend paid to preferred stockholders = Shares × Par value × Percentage × Number of years
Note: Since preferred stocks are cumulative in nature, the company is forced to pay last two years' dividends along with the current year's dividend.
= 3,000 shares × $120 × 8 % × 3 years
= $86,400
The dividend paid to Common stockholders = Cash dividend - Dividend paid to preferred stockholders
= $132,000 - $86,400
= $45,600
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.
