Question does not specify full graph need more information
The linked answer is wrong because that integral gives you the net displacement of the object, not the total distance.
To get the distance, you have to integrate the speed (as opposed to velocity), which involves integrating the absolute value of the velocity function.
By definition of absolute value,
Over this particular integration interval,
• sin(<em>t</em> ) ≥ 0 for 1 ≤ <em>t</em> < <em>π</em>, and
• sin(<em>t</em> ) < 0 for <em>π</em> < <em>t</em> ≤ 5
so you end up splitting the integral at <em>t</em> = <em>π</em> as
Now compute the distance:
making B the correct answer.
V of rec. prism = whl = 3x5x6 = 90
V of cone = 3.14 x (3)^2 (8) /3= 75.36
90 - 75.36 = 14.64
answer
14.64
(If It's a number like this: 8/9 then it's a fraction)
Answer:
<h2><em><u>
9. -2/6</u></em></h2><h2><em><u>
10. -6/-10</u></em></h2><h2><em><u>
11. 3/4</u></em></h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
Yay, I love doing these!
9.} 6 - 8 and 4- -2= -2/6
10.} 3 - 9 and -1 - 9= -6/-10
11.} -1 - -7 and 5 - -3= 6/8 simplify it by 2= 3/4
Answer:
The correct option is;
Because the vertical line intercepted the graph more than once, the graph is of a relation, but it is not a function
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that a function maps a given value of the input variable, to the output variable, we have that a relation that has two values of the dependent variable, for a given dependent variable is not a function
Therefore, a graph in which at one given value of the input variable, x, there are two values of the output variable y is not a graph of a function
With the vertical line test, if a vertical line drawn at any suitable location on the graph, intercepts the graph at more than two points, then the relationship shown on the graph is not a function.
