1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bad White [126]
3 years ago
5

Which way of thought or religion offers rules or guidelines for a moral life?

History
1 answer:
creativ13 [48]3 years ago
6 0

Buddhism and/or Confucianism is the way of thought or religion that offers rules or guidelines for a moral life. Hoped I helped :)

You might be interested in
Which is necessary for a society to be considered a civilization?
Kisachek [45]
The correct answer in my opinion would be that D is the most important factor here. But this question is quite tricky.

We can surely say for example that literature, organized schools and a hierarchy of priests are not something that constitute a civilization. Organized schools appeared to late, not every civilization had literature and having only a hierachy of priests is not enough to say you have a civilizaton.

Labor has been divided in pre-civilization hunter-gatherer societies as well. 

For that reason I'd say the correct answer is D - more food than is needed for survival. Having this, the people in a certain group can focus on other things. 
5 0
4 years ago
How did mussolini​ guarantee​ that Fascism was the only​ political party by 1926?
romanna [79]

<span>Mussolini’s road to a dictatorship took much longer than Hitler’s in 1933. Hitler was appointed chancellor on January 30th 1933. By April 1st 1933, his power was such that, after the Enabling Act, Hitler could only be seen as the dictator of Nazi Germany regardless of Hindenburg’s presidency. </span><span>Mussolini’s public posturing and boasts did not guarantee loyalty in Italy – hence why it was so important for him to establish a relationship with the Roman Catholic Church. He only gained what could be described as dictatorial powers after the Lateran Treaty whereby he could guarantee loyalty from those Catholics who may well have not been supporters of the fascist state in Italy.</span>

<span>Mussolini took years to achieve what could be defined as a dictatorship. He achieved some semblance of power after the March on Rome in 1922 when he was appointed Prime Minister of Italy. But his government contained a mixture of men with different political beliefs – similar to Hitler’s position in January 1933.</span>

But his time in power almost collapsed after the murder of Matteotti when great anger gripped Italy. If he had been a true dictator in 1922, then such an uproar would never have happened as his enemies and the Italian people in general would have been cowed into submission.

Mussolini started his time in power by buying support from both the working class and the industrial bosses.

<span>The workers were promised an eight hour day while an enquiry into the profits made by the industrialists during World War One was dropped. The rich benefited from a reduction in death duties – now, under Mussolini, more of what someone had earned during their lifetime, went to their family and not the government. To get support from the Roman Catholic Church, religious education was made compulsory in all elementary schools.</span>

<span>These policies can be seen as an attempt to ‘buy’ support. As an example, in 1933 Hitler introduced workers holidays into Germany (similar to a bank holiday). This was very popular. He then almost immediately banned trade unions which protected workers rights. Any protests over this were banned as a result of the Enabling Act – Hitler did not bargain with anyone. Mussolini was not in a position whereby he could assert his authority and it is probable that the extent of his dictatorial powers never did equal those acquired by Hitler.</span>

Mussolini had never intended to share power with the liberals who were in the government. He introduced a Fascist Grand Council which would decide policy for Italy without consulting the non-fascists in the government first.

<span>In February 1923, Mussolini and the Fascist Grand Council introduced the Acerbo Law. This law changed election results. Now if one party got just 25% (or more) of the votes cast in an election, they would get66%of the seats in parliament.</span>

When it came for Parliament to vote on the Acerbo Law, many politicians agreed to a law that would almost certainly end their political careers if they were not fascists. Why did they do this?

The gallery in the hall in which the politicians voted was filled with armed fascist thugs who had a good view of anybody who spoke out against the law. The threat was clear and real. If you voted for the law, you would be fine. If you did not, then you were certainly in danger from fascist thugs.

<span>Mussolini did say in the spring of 1924 that “a good beating did not hurt anyone.”</span>

5 0
4 years ago
He is a ….boy. He is often kind and helpful to every classmate.
julia-pushkina [17]

He is a good/ kind. boy. He is often kind and helpful to every classmate.

:)

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the USSR favor communism? And why did they promote it?
eimsori [14]

Answer:

Many Europeans were already followers of communism or related socialist ideologies even before the war due to the impact of the achievements of the Soviet Union in the fields of proletarian emancipation, industrial modernization and social progress.

We can think of the incredible response of international communists/leftist volunteers to fight in Spain against Franco and his fascist supporters (among which we can even find Italians and Germans!!!).

It is true that many communist and leftist organizations received a cold shower after the announcement of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact between Soviet Union and Nazi Germany but many thought that was a clever, albeit twisted, move of Stalin to trick the Nazi…in some way!

Anyway, after WWII the Soviet Union came out as the winner and a winner that almost singlehandedly won the war!!!

At the end Stalin seemed not only the benign "Father" of the workers but also the brilliant strategist that won the war for the communist ideology...

So if the Soviet Union managed to do that its ideology had to be the winning one!!!

Any kind of doubt or opposition to Stalinist communism was forgotten or silenced.

Fascists/Nazis were responsible for widespread destruction, massacres, famine and murder while the communists looked at themselves as the defenders of humanity against the evil doers that on top of everything even created concentration camps and prosecuted minorities (thing that was already happening for years in Soviet Union anyway).

In many nations like France, Greece, Yugoslavia, Italy communist guerrilla resistant fighters against the Nazis were now acclaimed as liberators and redeemer of the motherland.

There was also opportunism…In my country, Italy, after the war it is said that many black shirts turned red….overnight…and not because of weird problem in washing them!

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements most accurately describes the black Codes?
liq [111]
The second one about it being created after the civil war
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What do the republicans want, Today?
    7·2 answers
  • witch compromise kept the balance between slave states and free states (a) the missouri compromise (b) the compromise of 1850 (c
    14·1 answer
  • How did louis xiv expand his power?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following was NOT one of the results of the American Civil War?
    15·2 answers
  • the event that this artifact best relates to was the Second Great Awakening. This happened around the years 1800’s. One reason t
    10·1 answer
  • Which is the strongest motivation in industrial production?
    13·1 answer
  • Where is the kingdom of Mali located
    9·1 answer
  • *ASAP 20 POINTS PSYCHOLOGY QUESTION*
    11·2 answers
  • What did Woodrow Wilson do that fundamentally changed the nation's banking system that is still utilized today?
    5·1 answer
  • Explain ONE cultural or economic change in the late twentieth century that historians who support the
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!