Answer:
Rory is following the “<u>zoo</u> approach” to intercultural encounters.
Explanation:
When using the "zoo approach" to interact with a different culture, the individual observes this new culture the same way they would observe animals in a zoo; everything is exotic, foreign, different, and the humans at the other side of the cage are normal and free while the animals are the ones who are locked in their ways. However, even though this approach can sometimes be positive and teach interesting information, it is a limited perspective.
Quoting the book "<em>Ethics in intercultural and international Communication</em>", by Fred L. Casmir: "<em>One may discover amazing, interesting and valuable information by using such a perspective and even develop a real fondness for those exotic people, but miss the point that we are as culturally "caged" as others and that they are culturally as "free" as we are.</em>"
The full question is: In what different ways does the text distinguish prometheus's character from that of the other gods on mount olympus
Answer and Explanation:
The text to which the question refers is "Prometheus the friend of man."
In the text Prometheus is presented very differently from the other gods of Olympus. That's because he preferred to spend his time on earth working to make human life easier, unlike the Olympian gods, who preferred to do nothing, rest and receive offerings. Furthermore, the text shows that Prometheus wanted human beings to be independent and able to act without the help of the Olympian gods, who believed that human beings should be submissive and servants.
Quietism is an older christian philosophy.
Monaism is the idea that attributes oneness or singleness to a concept. Various kinds of monism can be distinguished.
<span>Aquinas rejected these mainly due to the fact that he In other words, was an anthropologist, with a complete theory of Man, right or wrong. He did not in any way believe in the divine. However he did believe that he had "To follow reason as far as it will go;" Aquinas lived in a time where more people believed in man was here for a reason and it would be that reason they had to find some day in his own life such as a king rulling over the people he once was a part of or a poet writing something and it making an impact in the lives of others. He believed in Man living for Man not that some God put us here to live for him instead we must find our reason of being put here and living for that reason.</span>
Answer:
he was able to speak up even though he was a person who was a different color, in those time when people were treat it awful
Answer:
A field in psychology that investigates the value of stories and storytelling in giving meaning to individuals' experiences—shaping their memory of past events, their understanding of the present, and their projections of future events—and in defining themselves and their lives.
