Well if this is multiple choice then tell me but other than that I can tell you what I personally think. Think of a fire, a fire might get bigger when it is hotter and it can even change colors but most of the time it does not get much brighter once it reaches a steady burn. Stars are kinda similar they can be big but not bright and vice versa. dwarf stars are a tad bit different but then again I will remind you that I am not professionally educated on this topic. the properties that determine such a star can be density, heat(of course), and chemical makeup. Density plays the largest role in such a situation because if the star is not dense but is made of a very hot material then a lot of the time it will be dim where if it is highly dense with a very hot material then often times they are very bright. I don't know if this helped but I hope for your case it did ^-^ I gave it my all XD.
Cabot claimed land in Canada. (He thought it was Asia)
Regulating televisions broadcasting
Answer:
D) The Soviet economy was a tremendous success story; the USSR would still be together if it were not for the ethnic differences.
Explanation:
The Soviet economy was not a tremendous success, in fact, it was in many aspects a failure (although it was a success in some fields).
The other 3, true statements in the question give us a clue why:
The Soviet system benefited the center (Russia) disproportionally, leaving aside the other, peripheral republics in Central Asia, the Caucasus, The Baltics, and Eastern Europe, which were often very poor.
The Soviet system used a planned economy, instead of a market economy, and this led to many errors in the production of goods and services. Resources were often poured in unprofitable industries over more profitable ones, and the geographical location of the economic sectors often did not make sense.
Things that in a market system would likely not happen, ocurred in the soviet planned economy because the planners did not realize their mistakes.
