Answer:
6
Step-by-step explanation:
All you need to do is devide 300 by 50 because you know that you have 300 dolars and it is 50 dollars per person. 300/50 is 6 therefore 6 people can be at the party.
Answer:
C, 200 miles in 4 hours
Step-by-step explanation:
You divide 200 by 4, then you get 50. 50 miles in 1 hour!
Answer:
1.Yes,No,Yes
2.Identitive
Step-by-step explanation:
I would say Identitive because it is being multiplied by 1 and this property states that anything multiplied by 1 is itself
Answer:
TWO BUCKS?? ballin on a budget
anyways, if there are 16 guests, the party would cost $50. sounds a lot more correct lol
Answer:
For the reasons mentioned in the explanation section, it is indeed a weak generalization:
Step-by-step explanation:
- No, there is not enough data provided on certain subjects' age, socioeconomic status, etc. that may have influenced the investing decision.
- No, the survey isn't random, the study is irregular because each has a fair probability of expressing their true beliefs, here in this query it's written they've been told individuals are given actual medication, which may have contributed to the Hawthorne studies giving incorrect outcomes.
- No, the amount isn't sufficient mostly on the premise of 28 subject areas with be provided oxytocin, and therefore only one test being performed should we not be able to determine the results to implement for certain persons including billions of populace, it would be a hurried generalization.
