If you would have to graph x=7, you probably know that this is a vertical line at, well, x=7.
| x | = 7 is nothing more than two vertical lines, namely x=7 or x=-7, as you already wrote down.
| x | = -8 has no (real) solutions, so there is nothing to graph.
Try this solution:
1. the standart form of the circle is: (x-x₀)²+(y-y₀)²=r², where point (x₀;y₀) - the cetre of the given circle, r - radius of the given circle.
2. Using r=7 and coordinates of the centre (0;0) it is possible to make up the required equation:
(x-0)²+(y-0)²=7²;
x²+y²=49.
Answer:
Apply the distributive property.
2x3+4−−x2−(3x)2x3+4--x2-(3x)
Multiply −−x2--x2.
Tap for fewer steps...
Multiply −1-1 by −1-1.
2x3+4+1x2−(3x)2x3+4+1x2-(3x)
Multiply x2x2 by 11.
2x3+4+x2−(3x)2x3+4+x2-(3x)
Multiply 33 by −1-1.
2x3+4+x2−3x2x3+4+x2-3x
Move 44.
2x3+x2−3x+4
If you mean .34 lbs and .13lbs, she would need 2.53
If you meant .34 and 1.3 lbs , she would need 1.36
If actually mean 34 lbs and 13lbs , Kaitlynn has way more than 3 lbs
Answer:
Becky, because her justification for the second statement should be "definition of supplementary angles" rather than "angle addition postulate."
Step-by-step explanation:
Becky completed the proof incorrectly because her justification for the second statement is not totally correct.
Angle addition postulate does not really apply here, as the sum of 2 angles may not give you exactly 180°.
However, the second statement, m<AKG + m<GKB = 180° and m<GKB + m<HKB = 180°, can be justified by the "Definition of Supplementary Angles".
The sum of supplementary angles = 180°.
Therefore, Becky completed the proof incorrectly.
