The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The situation where I adopted a holistic view of looking at a problem or situation was the time in which we had internal problems in the classroom that affected the socializing and harmony of the group. In the beginning, a just listened to one side of the story and my opinion was biased. However, when I was taught about the holistic approach, I learned how to be a better neutral observer and realized that there were many factors involved in the situation. So I saw the whole of the problem, not just one side.
Adopting a holistic view helped me make sense of the situation because I understood the different arguments of each side and other and other factors that were outside of my control. It gave me more patience to change what was in my hands, and tolerate and respect what was out of my reach.
Answer:
Because the actions of other road users are <u>unpredictable</u>, you can lower your risk if you adequately communicate to those around you. Always signal your intention to change lanes or turn.
Explanation:
Actions of other drivers are unpredictable that's why it is important to drive defensively and always signal your intention to change lanes or turn.
Answer:
A delta landform is a sophisticated depositional feature that typically occurs at the mouth of a river. By definition, the mouth of the river is where the river drains into a water body such as lake, ocean or sea, leading to reduction of the rivers capability to transport sediment any farther.
Explanation:
https://www.bing.com/search?q=delta+landform&FORM=AWRE
Answer:
Validity
Explanation:
In research, validity refers to whether the data and methodologies that are used in the research actually measures the things that the researchers are targeting.
From the case above, we can see that the searchers want to target Impulsive personality traits among adults but as it turn out the data that is taken is closer to sociable, outgoing, and fun adults (which is exactly the opposite of what';s the researchers are seeking for) Because of this, we can infer that the validity of the research is questionable.
The answer to this question is that Martha can sue the
person on negligent infliction of emotional distress.
<span>Negligent infliction of emotional distress is a claim or a
complaint where the accused or defendant’s negligence caused an emotional
damage or trauma to the complainant. When proven guilty, the defendant may be
liable in paying damages in the account of money.</span>
