Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
An inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning applies knowledge of past experiences and observations to form conclusions. The premise and conclusion goes "if this happened now... this must then happen". This type of reasoning moves from specific to general as opposed to deductive reasoning that moves from general to specific.
The argument in our question is also a fallacy. A fallacy is a faulty logic or weak argument. The argument is a fallacy of faulty generalization, the typical "jumping into conclusion".
Answer:
The Executive Office of the President (EOP) comprises four agencies that advise the president in key policy areas: the White House Office, the National Security Council, the Council of Economic Advisors, and the Office of Management and Budget.
Explanation:
ANSWER: (D) or aka the 4th option
EXPLANATION:
On September 11, 2001, 19 militants associated with the Islamic extremist group al Qaeda hijacked four airplanes and carried out su**ide attacks against targets in the United States.
You can also look it up online for more details.
COMPLETE QUESTION:
Kevin is told that if he works for five days at a telemarketing job, he can expect to earn $100 a day on commission alone. When he gets his paycheck at the end of the week, it comes to only about $80 per day. He’s very upset even when he finds out that his coworkers all made only about $60 each per day. This is an example of __________.
Group of answer choices
(a) relative deprivation
(b) dispositional frustration
(c) catharsis
(d) instrumental aggression
(e) fear-aggression
ANSWER: RELATIVE DEPRIVATION
EXPLANATION:
RELATIVE DEPRIVATION occurs when an individual have the perception or believe that he or she have a worse condition or lack a resources (e.g. money, rights, social equality) than other people in a common situation or event or within a socioeconomic group.
Thus, in Kelvin’s case, he had unfulfilled expectations due to pay cut, which in turn leads to frustration.
