The correct answer is Unlike ethics, these disciplines inquire why people act the way they do.
In the beginning, there was only <u>sociology</u> and <u>psychology</u>. Part of psychology became interested in social and group processes, and so social psychology emerged. That's why the names are related. Social psychology was born from the integration of psychology with sociology.
Sociology, on the other hand, was also interested in the individual processes that psychology was studying. The interaction between people and their environment has become the subject of sociologists' reflection, moving away from other macrosociological approaches. Therefore, we can say that there was a great influence on each other and vice versa.
An ionic solution would be able to conduct electricity where as the covalent would not so if you have a conductivity tester which are available in most labs you should be able to distinguish between the 2
Water, and I guess just aid in general if that counts, but mostly water
Answer:
Yes
Explanation: The Articles established “the United States of America” as a perpetual union formed to defend the states as a group, but it provided few central powers beyond that. But it didn't have an executive official or judicial branch
Answer:
The correct answer is ''ability to take the role''.
Explanation:
George Herbert Mead was a social psychologist who explained that the human societies in which we are interested are forest societies. The human individual is a self, only insofar as he takes the attitude of the other towards himself. Insofar as that attitude is that of a certain number of others, insofar as he can adopt the organized attitudes of a certain number of others who are cooperating in a common activity, he takes the group's attitudes towards himself, by taking that or those attitudes, is defining the object of the group that which defines and controls response. For Mead this is possible insofar as people are capable of internalizing the behavior of others, we are capable of acting knowing the behavior that others will do. By internalizing the "generalized other", that is, the attitudes of others, the individual behaves in a certain way.
